Search for: "Bell Supply Co., LLC v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 24
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2007, 1:10 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKBankingVisa's By-Law Prevented Banks From Switching To MasterCard, Violated Court's Final Judgment United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 11:05 am
"[12]  Both Queen City, Tominaga, and Mozart Co. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
PLIVA, Inc., 720 F.3d 739, 744 (8th Cir. 2013); Bell v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 7:06 pm by MOTP
The arbitrator agreed with Rain & Hail that Jody James did not "timely present[] notice of its claim in accordance with the provisions of the crop insurance policy" and, further, "did not state a presentable loss" because crops from performing and non-performing farm units were commingled. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am by Kevin LaCroix
  In Avon State Bank, David Gibson, a man who purported to be the son of a business associate of Ambrose Herdering, a customer of Avon State Bank, sought out the assistance of Herdering in moving the estate of Gibson’s deceased father from the Netherlands to the United States. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 10:00 am
Two different views (Hal Wegner)   Spain Motion to amend penal code on IP rights (International Law Office)   Morocco Morocco signs up for Trademark Law Treaty (Afro-IP)   Poland District Administrative Court in Warsaw rules ‘heritage’ has no distinctive character in dispute between Zygmunt Piotrowski and Heritage Films (Class 46) Some simplified seizures stats for 2008 (Class 46)   South Africa High Court order restrains Eastwood(s) Tavern… [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 10:01 pm by Coral Beach
This year the Town Hall panel is scheduled to include: Al V. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 9:26 am by Barry Sookman
Norwich supplies a principled rationale for granting injunctions against non-parties who facilitate wrongdoing (see Cartier, at paras. 51-55; and Warner-Lambert Co. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
 At least the state of the art at the time of the plaintiff’s use applies – unknown and later discovered risks are irrelevant. [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 9:00 am by Alan Horowitz
Introduction Depending on how the Court resolves a threshold issue, United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am by Legal Beagle
  As summarised in an Isle of Man judgment, the scheme resembled a “Ponzi” scheme in that apparent repayments to HC were in fact funded in a circular way by HC itself:  see paragraph 30 of the judgment of His Honour Deemster Corlett, Heather Capital Limited v KPMG Audit LLC, 17 November 2015. [9]        A third party, Nicholas Levene, was a participant in the scheme. [read post]