Search for: "Bell v. Children's Protective Services" Results 1 - 20 of 33
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2023, 4:15 pm by Reference Staff
The author is interviewed at PBS Books.'Poverty, By America' shows how the rest of us benefit by keeping others poorImmigrants and RefugeesNorthwest Immigrant Rights Project has provided legal services for nearly forty years. [read post]
25 Sep 2021, 2:36 pm by Eugene Volokh
Insisting that persons who already enjoy a high level of protection against the disease to obtain an additional level of protection is not the least restrictive means of achieving the State's interest in advancing public health. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 4:29 am by Joel R. Brandes
The doctrine protects the status interests of a child in an already recognized and operative parent‑child relationship (Matter of Juanita A. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 2:55 pm by MOTP
Ruth served as the Trustee until 2002, when, by judicial modification, she resigned, and the Trust was divided into four trusts of equal value, named after each of their four children.[1] Ruth is the sole beneficiary during her lifetime, and upon Ruth's death any remaining assets in the four trusts pass to the trust's namesake. [read post]
8 May 2018, 7:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Although the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 prohibits discrimination based on disability by entities receiving federal funds, and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) extended this protection more broadly to non-federally funded entities, it has been difficult to enforce federal disability protections in medical decision-making. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 11:37 pm by Wolfgang Demino
  WHO ENJOYS PROTECTIONS OF BONA FIDE PURCHASER DOCTRINE? [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 3:19 am
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2016)Madamina, il catalogo è questo   Delle belle che amò il padron mio;un catalogo egli è che ho fatt'io;Osservate, leggete con me. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 6:45 am by Michael Geist
In addition to the large telecom companies, there have been requests to Plenty of Fish (an online dating site), Club Penguin (a childrens game site), Kik (an online messaging service), Yahoo.ca, and Contact Privacy (a site that protects the privacy of domain name registrants). [read post]
27 May 2014, 3:37 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  It is considerably less absurd than the Hall majority's statement, "If the States were to have complete autonomy to define intellectual disability as they wished, the Court's decision in Atkins could become a nullity, and the Eighth Amendment's protection of human dignity would not become a reality. [read post]