Search for: "Bell v. Department of Revenue" Results 1 - 20 of 65
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2007, 10:26 am
Pollock report here (subscription req'd) on today's opinions in Bell Atlantic and Winkelman and the Court's decision to review Kentucky Department of Revenue v. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am by Bernard Bell
Bell, Legislative History Without Legislative Intent: The Public Justification Approach to Statutory Interpretation, 60 OHIO ST. [read post]
18 Apr 2020, 2:37 pm by Charles (Chuck) Rubin
The 2nd DCA concluded that the legislature could not substantively alter or materially limit the class of individuals eligible for the exemption under the plain language of the constitution.Department of Revenue v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 7:51 pm by vforberger
LIRC (Beres), Appeal No. 2016AP1365, and Wisconsin Bell, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 7:46 pm by vforberger
LIRC (Beres), Appeal No. 2016AP1365, and Wisconsin Bell, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 6:13 am by Barry Sookman
The decision by Justice Tremblay-Lamer in Bell Canada v ITVBOX.NET 2016 FC 612 to grant the injunction was not surprising. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 3:26 am
In the Bell case, the Justice Department got such an injunction against Marston's mentor, Thurston Bell, and the DOJ seems to have done the same with a number of others who had operated such sties. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Bernard Bell
S. ___, 141 S.Ct. 1220 (2021); see, Bernard Bell, A Little Blue Birdie Told Me: Knight First Amendment Institute v. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
Montana Department of Revenue, “raises an issue the U.S. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 4:32 am by Legal Beagle
HM Revenue and Customs has confirmed as recently as this month (May 2012) that lawyers have no exemption from the VAT rules. [read post]