Search for: "Bell v. District of Columbia"
Results 101 - 120
of 130
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Nov 2009, 6:36 pm
See Swierkiewicz v. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 3:35 pm
The next question asked about the landmark case of Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 5:58 am
P. 8 in accordance with Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 3:00 pm
Kennedy School of Government and from Columbia University's School of Non-Profit Management. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 11:18 pm
Ian Boyko, Canadian Federation of Students Expand fair dealing in line with the case of CHH v. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 5:01 pm
Bell Atl. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 3:13 pm
Two recent Supreme Court decisions, Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
Sterling Drug, Inc., 416 F.2d 417, 426 (2d Cir. 1969).District of Columbia: McNeil Pharmaceutical v. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 10:42 am
We've been keeping an eye on some interesting litigation in the District of Columbia, Iacangelo v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 4:27 am
After hearing, the motion is ALLOWED in part. 1 Plaintiff asserts violations of the false claims acts in California, Delaware, Florida, Hawaii, Illinois, Massachusetts, Nevada, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, District of Columbia, and New York. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
United States Issue: Whether a district court may direct a defendant to serve a federal sentence consecutively to a not-yet-imposed state sentence. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 10:00 pm
District of Columbia, 747 A.2d 138145 (D.C. 2000); Mervin v. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 8:10 am
[iv] Examples: District of Columbia – 15 years, D.C. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 6:30 am
Johnson, No. 06-1071 Galveston Central Appraisal District v. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 3:45 pm
In a 1986 decision, Ohio Civil Rights Commission v. [read post]
16 Dec 2007, 10:22 am
The new case, District of Columbia v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 7:39 am
Box 404 Bellmore, NY 11710, Phone: (516) 733-4377 E-mail: chadd_of_nassau_county@yahoo.com CHADD of the Capital District of New York P.O. [read post]
