Search for: "Bell v. State of North Carolina" Results 1 - 20 of 150
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2008, 2:47 pm
Today, the North Carolina Court of Appeals said that it did not have the authority to adopt the "new" standard for consideration of a Rule 12(b)(6) Motion articulated last year by the United States Supreme Court in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:26 am by Carolina Attorneys
COA18-229 Filed: 1 October 2019 Cabarrus County, No. 17CRS052368-69 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:57 am
In the latest twist in this long-running saga, the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina has found the term PRETZEL CRISPS to be generic for pretzel crackers. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 6:00 am by Martha Engel
Michigan v Duke, Michigan State v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 3:25 am by Alfred Brophy
Moreover, it was a decision that was largely imposed (in Bell’s picture) on the south by people in the north. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 2:19 am by Alfred Brophy
Since dead people don’t cash checks, the bill will not bust the state’s treasury: About 7,600 men, women and children as young as 10 were sterilized in North Carolina, yet fewer than 200 surviving victims have been identified by the state so far. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 12:08 pm
By James Bowden On Tuesday, a task force in North Carolina concluded that it would request restitution of $50,000 from the North Carolina legislature to each of the estimated 1,500-2,000 living victims of the state's formal 45-year experiment with eugenics. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 12:08 pm
By James Bowden On Tuesday, a task force in North Carolina concluded that it would request restitution of $50,000 from the North Carolina legislature to each of the estimated 1,500-2,000 living victims of the state's formal 45-year experiment with eugenics. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 8:56 am by Kate Shaw
In the case of Moore, proponents of the ISLT argued that the North Carolina Supreme Court acted beyond its authority when it found that an extreme partisan gerrymander drawn by the North Carolina legislature violated the North Carolina state constitution. [read post]