Search for: "Bellamy v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 57
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2024, 8:19 am
Read the opinion The post REGINALD BELLAMY v. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 1:55 pm
Criminal procedure — Illegal sentence — Merger of false imprisonment and first-degree rape Following a jury trial in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Reginald Bellamy, Jr., appellant, was convicted of first-degree rape, first-degree sex offense, attempted first-degree sex offense, second-degree assault, and false imprisonment. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 10:22 am
The case for that proposition is Rentas v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 10:42 am
By Gene HealyNovember 4, 2003It seems there’s no escaping America’s culture wars for the Supreme Court: On Tuesday, Oct. 14, the Court announced that it would hear Elk Grove Unified School District v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 5:49 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2012, 7:07 pm
” It also states that “Category of the not a plugged nickle [sic] means get nothing… . [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:16 am
Everything that touches Kareem Bellamy’s world seems to turn ugly. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 12:01 am
In 1943 the Supreme Court overturned the Gobitis decision in the case of West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 2:02 am
American students citing the Pledge with the Bellamy salute In West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 5:07 am
” Bellamy v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 2:35 am
State v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 5:38 am
State v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 3:15 am
" However, in 1943, the Court changed its course in West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 4:01 pm
Last year, former Secretary of State for Justice Dominic Raab made changes to the Parole Board rules which prevented Prison and Probation staff from providing the Parole Board with recommendations regarding the release of imprisoned persons, However, it was held to be unlawful and reversed following its High Court challenge, R v Bailey. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
Citing Matter of Bellamy v New York City Police Dept., 87 AD3d 874, the Appellate Division opined that the Fund met its burden of showing a possibility that disclosure of [such] names could endanger the lives or safety of police retirees, as required to exempt them from disclosure pursuant to Public Officers Law §87(2)(f)". [read post]
5 May 2016, 8:04 am
Stangenberg v Bellamy Software, 2016 ABQB 160 http://www.canlii.org/en/ab/abqb/doc/2016/2016abqb160/2016abqb160.pdf … [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
Citing Matter of Bellamy v New York City Police Dept., 87 AD3d 874, the Appellate Division opined that the Fund met its burden of showing a possibility that disclosure of [such] names could endanger the lives or safety of police retirees, as required to exempt them from disclosure pursuant to Public Officers Law §87(2)(f)". [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 3:13 pm
According to Schweikert: Under the landmark Supreme Court case Brady v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm
Policy v New York City Off. of Payroll Admin., 187 AD3d 435, 435 [1st Dept 2020] [internal quotation marks omitted], lv denied 36 NY3d 906 [2021]; see also Matter of Bellamy v New York City Police Dept., 87 AD3d 874, 875 [1st Dept 2011], affd 20 NY3d 1028 [2013]). [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm
Policy v New York City Off. of Payroll Admin., 187 AD3d 435, 435 [1st Dept 2020] [internal quotation marks omitted], lv denied 36 NY3d 906 [2021]; see also Matter of Bellamy v New York City Police Dept., 87 AD3d 874, 875 [1st Dept 2011], affd 20 NY3d 1028 [2013]). [read post]
