Search for: "Bellamy v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 58
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2024, 11:26 am
A year later, a College Park woman’s murder investigation led officers to suspect that the last […] The post VAUGHN DARVEL BELLAMY v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 8:19 am
Read the opinion The post REGINALD BELLAMY v. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 4:01 pm
Last year, former Secretary of State for Justice Dominic Raab made changes to the Parole Board rules which prevented Prison and Probation staff from providing the Parole Board with recommendations regarding the release of imprisoned persons, However, it was held to be unlawful and reversed following its High Court challenge, R v Bailey. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 12:07 am
“ Reforming the law on cohabitation The Chair of the Commons Women and Equalities Committee has written to Lord Bellamy KC, Parliamentary Under Secretary of State, Ministry of Justice calling on the Government to improve protections for cohabitants in England and Wales in the event of relationship breakdown or the death of a partner. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm
Policy v New York City Off. of Payroll Admin., 187 AD3d 435, 435 [1st Dept 2020] [internal quotation marks omitted], lv denied 36 NY3d 906 [2021]; see also Matter of Bellamy v New York City Police Dept., 87 AD3d 874, 875 [1st Dept 2011], affd 20 NY3d 1028 [2013]). [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm
Policy v New York City Off. of Payroll Admin., 187 AD3d 435, 435 [1st Dept 2020] [internal quotation marks omitted], lv denied 36 NY3d 906 [2021]; see also Matter of Bellamy v New York City Police Dept., 87 AD3d 874, 875 [1st Dept 2011], affd 20 NY3d 1028 [2013]). [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 12:14 am
In answer to a Written Question in the Lords from Lord Pickles as to why the Government has committed to legislating for outdoor religious marriages outside of wholesale reform of marriage law [HL4172], Lord Bellamy, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State at MoJ, replied as follows: “As part of the response to the Covid-19 pandemic, in which the circumstances were exceptional, the Government accelerated legislation to allow outdoor civil weddings and civil partnership… [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 3:30 am
Lord Bellamy, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State at the Ministry of Justice, told the House that the Government hopes to publish its initial response to the Law Commission’s final recommendations on reforming weddings law in England and Wales in the first part of next year. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 12:09 pm
This was stated in the management agreement. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 5:01 am
From Florio v. [read post]
19 Dec 2021, 10:19 am
Unfortunately, Mr Grasso had sent emails to prospective tenants stating “The licence may sound like a “concentration camp” but please don’t get spooked by those draconian rules. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
Citing Matter of Bellamy v New York City Police Dept., 87 AD3d 874, the Appellate Division opined that the Fund met its burden of showing a possibility that disclosure of [such] names could endanger the lives or safety of police retirees, as required to exempt them from disclosure pursuant to Public Officers Law §87(2)(f)". [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
Citing Matter of Bellamy v New York City Police Dept., 87 AD3d 874, the Appellate Division opined that the Fund met its burden of showing a possibility that disclosure of [such] names could endanger the lives or safety of police retirees, as required to exempt them from disclosure pursuant to Public Officers Law §87(2)(f)". [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 6:55 am
Nor is there anything in Bellamy’s case (Bellamy v Hounslow LBC (2006) EWCA Civ 535;) (a case where there were appeals against an original decision of 4 August 2004 and against a decision on review out of time on 15 November 2004) to suggest that the review decision under appeal was a nullity, as is suggested by the decisions in Muloko and Khamassi. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm
The Guardian considers how surveillance companies are assisting in state surveillance mandates. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 10:22 am
The case for that proposition is Rentas v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 12:01 am
In 1943 the Supreme Court overturned the Gobitis decision in the case of West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 3:13 pm
According to Schweikert: Under the landmark Supreme Court case Brady v. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 4:02 pm
The Protocol allows the highest national courts of Member States to pose questions to the Court on the interpretation and application of Convention rights in pending cases. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:16 am
Everything that touches Kareem Bellamy’s world seems to turn ugly. [read post]
