Search for: "Bennett v. State Corporation Commission" Results 1 - 20 of 68
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2009, 3:08 pm
The Federal Election Commission, which has grown from a limited question about a political documentary (concerning Hillary Clinton) to a broad challenge to the government's right to restrict corporations from spending money to support or oppose political candidates. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 8:18 am by Lydia Estep
Civil Rights and Sexual Orientation On June 15, 2020, the Supreme Court decided Bostock v. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 11:41 pm by Mark Summerfield
  In reaching this conclusion, the judge appeared to be strongly influenced by the state of the prior art, as represented by the evidence upon which InfoTrack relied for its novelty and innovative step cases.Encompass has appealed that decision (Encompass Corporation Pty Ltd v InfoTrack Pty Ltd, NSD734/2018) to a Full Bench of the Federal Court of Australia. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 1:10 am by Michael Douglas
In April, Thawley J granted the Commission leave to serve the first respondent (Facebook Inc) in the United States, and the second respondent (Facebook Ireland Ltd) in the Republic of Ireland. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 5:30 pm by INFORRM
For instance, a post cited by Mr Hoffman from 9 October 2015 stated Update October 9, 2015: more consultants have left DHR London, and a reliable source has told us that only two of the CTPartners transfers are left: Alex Bennett and Laurence Vallaeys. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 9:44 am by Dennis Crouch
LSI Corporation, No. 19-337 (state sovereign immunity against IPR challenge) Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 11:42 am by Erwin Chemerinsky
Federal Elections Commission in 2010 applied this distinction and held that limits on independent expenditures by corporations violate the First Amendment. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
On 2 March 2022, Nicklin J gave an ex tempore judgment dismissing the libel claim in Eurasian Natural Resources Corporation v Burgis. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 1:19 am by INFORRM
As mentioned above, on 27 February 2024, judgment on meaning was handed down in Dyson Technology Ltd & Anor v Channel Four Television Corporation & Anor [2024] EWHC 400 (KB) by Lewis J. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 11:12 am by Fred Wertheimer
Federal Election Commission (corporate independent expenditure ban), McCutcheon v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 11:43 am by Aurora Barnes
Township of Scott, Pennsylvania 17-647 Issues: (1) Whether the Supreme Court should reconsider the portion of Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]