Search for: "Bennett v. United States" Results 201 - 220 of 739
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2012, 5:00 pm by Mark Bennett
Judge Blackburn cited two cases in support of his authority to enter such an order: United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:02 pm
Under Title III of that act, United States citizens who had their property confiscated by the Castro regime were given the right to file suit against those who traffic in such properties (See Libertad Act  §§ 301-306). [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 1:09 pm by Shannon Hill
Expanding the Internet of Things: Four Key Legal IssuesOctober 2020 By David Verhey Verhey is Partner with Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig in Washington DC office. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 5:17 pm by crush
Phelps, the funeral-protest case, and United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 10:11 am by Gordon Firemark
Supreme Court Rules Against Aereo Place-and-Time-Shifting Technology Case Note by Gordon Firemark On June 25, the United States Supreme Court issued its much-anticipated ruling in American Broadcasting Co v. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 2:33 pm by Miriam Seifter
The government faced an uphill battle in Wednesday’s argument in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 10:48 am by Holly Brezee
In the Eastern District of Virginia, the leading case on prepetition discharge waiver clauses is Estate of McCoy v. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 1:30 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Thus, there is no requirement that in the state court proceeding the petitioner cite the provisions of the United States Constitution which were violated. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 11:19 am by Scott Harman
Seamus Hughes and Bennett Clifford detailed how the capture of Soulay Noah Su, a 16-year-old United States citizen ostensibly fighting for the Islamic State in Syria, represents a departure from the norms that apply to most foreign-born ISIS fighters. [read post]
3 May 2020, 6:30 pm by Steve Kalar
The Ninth’s decision in Estate of Barabin, extended to criminal trials in 2014 in United States v. [read post]