Search for: "Benson v. General Services Administration" Results 1 - 20 of 34
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2017, 5:52 am by Staci Zaretsky
Perhaps he ought to take another look at Clinton v. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 12:39 pm by Giles Peaker
No prejudice to the leaseholders had been found by the FTT, pursuant to Daejan Investments Ltd v Benson (2013) UKSC 14. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 5:54 am by Jed Handelsman Shugerman
The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in Seila Law v. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 6:43 am by Kevin Kaufman
While a few states include certain digital goods and services in their sales tax base, at present no state imposes a standalone tax on digital services, which is considerably more complex. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Finally, the list includes a group of cases discussing apportionment of permanent disability between separate injuries per Benson v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:16 am by Connor Clerkin, Lane Corrigan
According to data from the 2018 and 2016 Election Administration and Voting Survey, late receipt is the number one cause of rejected mail ballots. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 8:28 am by Gene Quinn
  The State Street invention related generally to a system that allowed an administrator to monitor and record the financial information flow and make all calculations necessary for maintaining a partner fund financial services configuration. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP Down… [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
 Freedom of contract remains the general rule. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
DMCA safe harbors don’t protect such service providers.10 Inducement, as described by the Supreme Court in MGM v. [read post]