Search for: "Berrisford v. Berrisford"
Results 1 - 20
of 29
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2019, 12:10 pm
Suffice it to say at this juncture that the law is settled in this area: the Supreme Court having reconsidered the requirement that all tenancies must be for a term certain, and giving the rule renewed (if, it must be said, grudging) approval in Mexfield Housing Co-operative Ltd v Berrisford(2012) 1 AC 955. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 4:19 am
Astonishingly, or perhaps just boldly, though, he went on to criticise the reasoning of the Supreme Court in Berrisford, having been given some suasion by Southward Housing Co-Operative v Walker [2016] Ch 443 (our note). [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 1:05 am
This point was argued for Ms Watts by Mark Wonnacott QC (who argued successfully for the tenant in Mexfield Housing Co-Op v Berrisford), whose The History of Landlord and Tenant should have been on everybody’s Santa list. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:41 pm
[1992] 2 AC 386 and Mexfield Housing Co-operative Ltd. v Berrisford [2011] UKSC 52 as both taking the view that the LPA 1925 “seemed to underwrite the established common law position”, rather than invalidating the previous common law position on ‘hybrid’ tenancies. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 1:02 pm
Berrisford [2011] UKSC 52 and Hammersmith & Fulham LBC v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 6:45 am
It is based on a wrong reading of the Supreme Court judgment in Berrisford v Mexfield Housing Co-Operative Ltd [2011] UKSC 52 (our note here). [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 8:51 am
The suggestions are:* Concerns about the scope of Authorised Guarantee Agreements under the Landlord and Tenant (Covenants) Act 1995, following the Court of Appeal’s decision in K/S Victoria Street v House of Fraser [2011] EWCA Civ 904, in which the court confirmed that a “direct guarantee” was not permitted under the Act.* Residual problems with the rule that a lease must have a certain term, in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in… [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 8:51 am
The suggestions are:* Concerns about the scope of Authorised Guarantee Agreements under the Landlord and Tenant (Covenants) Act 1995, following the Court of Appeal’s decision in K/S Victoria Street v House of Fraser [2011] EWCA Civ 904, in which the court confirmed that a “direct guarantee” was not permitted under the Act.* Residual problems with the rule that a lease must have a certain term, in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in… [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 12:48 pm
There was no certainty of term and, unlike in the recent case of Berrisford v Mexfield (our report here) there was no written disposition of land or contract. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 12:48 pm
There was no certainty of term and, unlike in the recent case of Berrisford v Mexfield (our report here) there was no written disposition of land or contract. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 1:00 am
By implication, this amounted to a monthly periodic tenancy in accordance with the decision in Street v Mountford [1985] AC 809. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 2:15 am
Mexfield Housing Co-operative Ltd v Berrisford [2011] UKSC 52; [2011] WLR (D) 322 “An agreement for a term of uncertain duration could not give rise to a tenancy in accordance with its terms but, pursuant to section 149(6) of the Law of Property Act 1925, it could take effect as a lease for 90 years, determinable on the death of the tenant.” WLR Daily, 9th November 2011 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:42 am
Berrisford v Mexfield Housing Co-operative Ltd (Rev 1) [2011] UKSC 32What happens to a lease for an uncertain term? [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:42 am
Berrisford v Mexfield Housing Co-operative Ltd (Rev 1) [2011] UKSC 32What happens to a lease for an uncertain term? [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:11 am
Supreme Court Berrisford v Mexfield Housing Co-operative Ltd [2011] UKSC 32 (9 November 2011) Jones v Kernott [2011] UKSC 53 (9 November 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Cheshire West and Chester Council v P [2011] EWCA Civ 1257 (09 November 2011) Fresenius Kabi Deutschland GMBH & Ors v Carefusion 303 Inc [2011] EWCA Civ 1288 (08 November 2011) SH (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 1284 (08… [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:31 am
Berrisford appealed. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 9:39 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Berrisford v Mexfield Housing Co-operative Ltd, heard 05-06 October 2011. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:42 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Berrisford (FC) v Mexfield Housing Co-operative Ltd, heard 05-06 October 2011. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 2:52 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Berrisford (FC) v Mexfield Housing Co-operative Ltd, heard 05-06 October 2011. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 2:52 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Berrisford (FC) v Mexfield Housing Co-operative Ltd, heard 05-06 October 2011. [read post]
