Search for: "Berrisford v. Berrisford"
Results 21 - 29
of 29
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2011, 2:52 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Berrisford (FC) v Mexfield Housing Co-operative Ltd, heard 05-06 October 2011. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 2:52 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Berrisford (FC) v Mexfield Housing Co-operative Ltd, heard 05-06 October 2011. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:42 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Berrisford (FC) v Mexfield Housing Co-operative Ltd, heard 05-06 October 2011. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 1:05 am
This point was argued for Ms Watts by Mark Wonnacott QC (who argued successfully for the tenant in Mexfield Housing Co-Op v Berrisford), whose The History of Landlord and Tenant should have been on everybody’s Santa list. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 12:48 pm
There was no certainty of term and, unlike in the recent case of Berrisford v Mexfield (our report here) there was no written disposition of land or contract. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 12:48 pm
There was no certainty of term and, unlike in the recent case of Berrisford v Mexfield (our report here) there was no written disposition of land or contract. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:41 pm
[1992] 2 AC 386 and Mexfield Housing Co-operative Ltd. v Berrisford [2011] UKSC 52 as both taking the view that the LPA 1925 “seemed to underwrite the established common law position”, rather than invalidating the previous common law position on ‘hybrid’ tenancies. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 1:02 pm
Berrisford [2011] UKSC 52 and Hammersmith & Fulham LBC v. [read post]
3 Aug 2019, 12:10 pm
Suffice it to say at this juncture that the law is settled in this area: the Supreme Court having reconsidered the requirement that all tenancies must be for a term certain, and giving the rule renewed (if, it must be said, grudging) approval in Mexfield Housing Co-operative Ltd v Berrisford(2012) 1 AC 955. [read post]
