Search for: "Best v. Shell Oil Co"
Results 41 - 52
of 52
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
December 21, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
21 Dec 2009, 10:57 am
— Imelda V. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 1:01 am
The answer to that question requires an understanding of the “purpose and nature” of the impugned use: Shell Co of Australia Ltd v Esso Standard Oil (Australia) Ltd (1963) 109 CLR 407 at 426(the Shell case) per Kitto J. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 9:07 am
Shell Oil Products Co., Dkt. 08-240, and Shell Oil Products Co. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 5:38 pm
Shell trial has now been delayed until this week. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 9:27 pm
Shell Oil Co. (1993) 17 Cal.App.4th 1651, 1658, another medical monitoring case, which states without citing any authority whatsoever that "medical monitoring damages reimburse the specific cost of periodic medical testing which is proved by a reasonable medical certainty to be necessary. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 5:41 am
U.S. and California, and Shell Oil v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 4:09 pm
Shell Pipeline Co. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 9:09 am
Shell Pipeline Co. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
: (IP Down Under), (Spicy IP), (Ars Technica), (Patent Baristas), Clash over World Customs Organisation efforts on IP enforcement: (Intellectual Property Watch), Economics before legal solutions: (Dilanchian), Who is the best person to lead WIPO? [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:16 pm
Nelson v. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 7:57 am
" Lamie v. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 7:41 am
" Shell Oil Co., 498 A.2d at 1113. [read post]
