Search for: "Betty v. Superior Court"
Results 1 - 20
of 25
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2024, 8:09 am
Ex Parte Young.Judge Nelson's opinion expressly concedes that "Wolfe v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 8:51 am
Kelly v. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 9:22 pm
People v. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 10:01 am
The case raises an interesting question of “respondeat superior” for the negligent acts by employees in the course of employment. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:03 am
Rogers v. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 6:29 am
” On May 13, 2022, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Maureen Duffy-Lewis issued a ruling in Crest v. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 6:29 am
” On May 13, 2022, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Maureen Duffy-Lewis issued a ruling in Crest v. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 12:30 am
Background Betty James owned a piece of residential property on Belarbor Street in southeast Houston. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 3:22 am
At least one court, Cortes v 3A N. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 9:24 am
This post examines a recent decision from the California Court of Appeal – 2d District: Dove v. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 11:58 am
— Whatcom County): Bree Blackhorse Declaration Rory Lee Gilliland Declaration Betty Leathers Letter Whatcom County Superior Court Minute Order [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 9:33 am
This post was written by Betty S.W. [read post]
26 Oct 2013, 7:09 pm
--Marvin v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 11:00 am
Political Backing v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 8:50 pm
The Superior Court’s opinion clarifies that an employee’s off-duty conduct must have a non-speculative impact on the employer’s business in order to constitute “just cause” for termination.A Hairy SituationThe case of Michael Christopher Designs v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 9:20 am
Thank you to all who posted for a spectacularly worthwhile and open conversation about Turner v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 3:57 pm
No one knows what the Supreme Court will do in Turner v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 12:12 pm
Arguing for the store chain in Wal-Mart Stores v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 9:00 am
Justices Thomas Hollenhorst and Betty Richli concurred. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 3:25 am
Superior Court, 480 U.S. 102, 112(1987); but cf. [read post]