Bey v Neuman, 2012 NY Slip Op 07262 (2d Dept. 2012) “Initially, contrary to the Lenox Hill defendants’ contention, under the circumstances of this case, we may consider the affirmation of the plaintiff’s expert, which was notarized in Pennsylvania, even though it lacked a certificate of conformity (see CPLR 2309[c]; Matter of Recovery [...] [read post]