Search for: "Bey v. Moorish Temple"
Results 1 - 18
of 18
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Aug 2022, 4:05 am
In Bey v. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
In Dykes-Bey v. [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 4:00 pm
In Bey v. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 4:05 am
In Neely-Bey v. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 6:37 am
LEXIS 107490 and in Mohammad-Bey v. [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 7:37 am
LEXIS 174301 (MD PA, Dec. 15, 2016), a Pennsylvania federal magistrate judge recommended that an inmate who is an adherent of Moorish Science Temple of America be allowed to move ahead on his Establishment Clause challenge to a Therapeutic Community program, alleging it has a religious component. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 1:48 pm
LEXIS 151714 (SDIN, Sept. 19, 2017), an Indiana federal district court dismissed on qualified immunity grounds a suit by an inmate claiming that his rights were violated when prison authorities disciplined him for violating a resolution of the Moorish Science Temple of America prohibiting him from actively engaging in MSTA religious services.In Sabin v. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 12:23 pm
The problem resulted from authorities mistakenly believing plaintiff had been transferred.In Jack-Bey v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 5:53 am
LEXIS 45394, March 4, 2014) and dismissed for lack of standing an inmate's complaint that prison rules do not allow Moorish Science ordained ministers and Temple heads to perform marriage ceremonies for adherents incarcerated in Alabama prisons.In Darrough v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 5:18 am
In Jack-Bey v. [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 9:10 am
The inmate had failed to specify his religious affiliation when he was booked into the facility.In Hosey-Bey v. [read post]
8 Dec 2013, 7:23 am
LEXIS 171315 (WD MI, Dec. 5, 2013), a Michigan federal district court permitted an inmate who was a member of the Moorish Science Temple of America to proceed with his free exercise complaint that he was barred from entering the prison law library with religious reading material.In Hoeck v. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 6:54 am
LEXIS 73801, April 25, 2011) and allowed an inmate who was a member of the Moorish Science Temple to proceed with his free exercise claim that he was denied the right to purchase a red fez because red was seen as gang colors; and with his 1st and 14th Amendment claims that Moorish Science Temple adherents were denied separate congregational services. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 12:21 pm
The denial was based on the inmate's answers to three questions about Buddhism and a vegetarian diet, as well as on his record of food purchases.In Smith-Bey v. [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 8:36 am
LEXIS 41017 (MD PA, March 29, 2016), a Pennsylvania federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendations that an inmate who was a member of the Moorish Science Temple of America and objected to the Therapeutic Community program in which he was required to participate can move ahead with an establishment clause, but not a free exercise clause, claim.In Presley v. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 7:00 am
LEXIS 74558 (CD CA, July 22, 2010), a California federal magistrate judge rejected objections by an inmate who is a member of the Moorish Science Temple of America to a prison ban on wearing of red clothing (except in sporting events). [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 3:35 am
The inmate was a member of the Moorish Scientific Temple of America. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 7:40 am
LEXIS 90323 (Feb. 27, 2009)) and held that material questions of fact remained for trial in a suit by an inmate, a member of the Moorish Science Temple of America, who wanted prison officials to use his religious name in prison documents.In Smith v. [read post]
