Search for: "Bible v. State"
Results 121 - 140
of 954
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
The court must consider the national security and public safety threats posed by concealable weapons
30 Oct 2021, 12:26 pm
New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 7:22 am
"[17] [V.] [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 8:13 am
A v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 8:03 am
" Berger v. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court have decided to vote with their hands on a Bible rather than on the U.S. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:01 pm
Texas passed even more restrictions on abortion providers, which were struck down as unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in 2016 in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 2:01 am
Jane Doe v. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 2:01 am
Jane Doe v. [read post]
8 Sep 2021, 9:00 pm
’”Thus, in Lockett v. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 10:06 am
” on it, and she had received anonymous notes citing Bible verses, commenting on her transgender identity and stating that people like her should be put to death. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 4:21 pm
In United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 12:04 pm
The U.S. government filed a civil-forfeiture action in which the named defendants were the objects themselves: The United States of America v. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 12:04 pm
The U.S. government filed a civil-forfeiture action in which the named defendants were the objects themselves: The United States of America v. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 11:31 am
Newsom that the state of California could not apply Covid-19 restrictions to an at-home Bible study group that had more than three households meeting in the same room, in violation of a state regulation. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 12:30 pm
Dissent: The $500 limit is not too low, and the $3k limit is no different from the prohibition on foreign contributions upheld in Bluman v. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 12:30 pm
Meanwhile, the Supreme Court decides Fulton v. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 5:35 pm
Early last month the Department of Justice filed a “Statement of Interest” in Migyanko v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 8:46 am
Briefly, in the matter of M.A. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 10:03 am
As stated by one of the followers during the trial the consequences would be much more severe than any sanction from the courts: “Anyone who violates a holy scripture will, as the Bible says, be condemned”.Therefore, the followers published Martinus’ original work without permission. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 12:56 pm
Supreme Court justice Thurgood Marshall later acknowledged [Pauli Murray’s first book, States’ Laws on Race and Color] as his ‘bible’ in the historic Brown v. [read post]
