Search for: "Bies v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 776
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2019, 6:42 am
Regulation BI was adopted in June 2019, became effective September 10, 2019, and firms will be required to begin complying with the rule by June 30, 2020 (XY Planning Network, LLC v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 9:35 am
Supreme Court ruled in Atkins v. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 7:10 am
Mitchell and Bies v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 1:24 pm
At the conference, he delivered a presentation entitled “LGBT Employment Discrimination in the United States post-Obergefell v. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 4:36 am
In Bi-Economy v. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 6:10 pm
Scott v. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 8:51 am
Mark III Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 7:42 am
Administrative law — Employment termination — Probationary employee Appellant, the Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission (“WSSC”) (a bi-county, State agency), terminated the employment of its probationary employee, Appellee, James Evan Richards (“Richards”), on 31 January 2017. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 5:33 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 10:12 am
Miami Bis. [read post]
NY Federal Court: Availability of Consequential Damages Not Limited to Commercial Property Insurance
22 Jun 2009, 2:10 am
In Woodworth v. [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 9:42 pm
On Monday the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Bobby v. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 8:51 am
Here, Mark III needed a more definite written contract with Sysco, to prevent work from being taken from Mark III and its partner in responding to the RFP, BI.Mark III Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 11:30 pm
Peter Rehder v. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 1:26 pm
State. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:13 am
The Appellate Division sustained a Supreme Court ruling that rejected the New York-New Jersey Port Authority's arguments that as a bi-state entity created by a federally approved compact it cannot be held liable under Labor Law §§240(1) or 241(6) for injuries plaintiff allegedly sustained while working in a building owned by the Authority.The court explained that the Compact Clause of the United States Constitution is not implicated by the application of… [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:13 am
The Appellate Division sustained a Supreme Court ruling that rejected the New York-New Jersey Port Authority's arguments that as a bi-state entity created by a federally approved compact it cannot be held liable under Labor Law §§240(1) or 241(6) for injuries plaintiff allegedly sustained while working in a building owned by the Authority.The court explained that the Compact Clause of the United States Constitution is not implicated by the application of… [read post]
26 Oct 2008, 6:23 am
As the court in Casey v. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 6:31 am
State v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 6:44 am
Perhaps it is the broader SCOTUS death penalty context of Bobby v. [read post]
