Search for: "Billings v. Billings" Results 281 - 300 of 29,900
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2020, 6:10 am by Payton Smith
” Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky condemned the anti-abortion actions of the Kentucky legislators, expressing that the bills passed by the House “have one goal in mind: to bring a direct challenge to Roe v. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 10:48 am by HRWatchdog
AB 2257 (Gonzalez) — Exemptions and Clarifications to AB 5 AB 2257 adds additional clarifications and exemptions to AB 5, a bill passed in 2019 that codified the Supreme Court’s decision in Dynamex Operations West Inc. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 8:48 am by [email protected]
  Defendants Jailed as Teens Raise Legal Challenges to Sentencing in Adult Courts We recently noted how the recent case of Cameron Moon v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 8:48 am by [email protected]
  Defendants Jailed as Teens Raise Legal Challenges to Sentencing in Adult Courts We recently noted how the recent case of Cameron Moon v. [read post]
30 May 2019, 7:59 am by Charles Gallmeyer
HB2495 comes as other states, including Alabama, Georgia, Mississippi, Missouri and Ohio, test the limits of Roe v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 5:40 am by David Canton
One of the most controversial aspects of the copyright reform bill is the digital lock provisions, which make it unlawful to break digital locks, even if it is only to exercise a right copyright law actually gives you. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
As a paternal consent requirement, this bill plainly violates the Constitution, as the Supreme Court ruled in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 10:23 am by Kevin Kaufman
To clarify the complex issue of internet sales taxes, the 2018 Supreme Court case South Dakota v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 3:45 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The rules for attorney billing are different from those of any other profession. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 7:17 am by Brian E. Spang
Premier Dealer Services, 2013 IL App (1st) 12037, 993 N.E.2d 938); Codifies the common law requirements set forth in Reliable Fire v. [read post]
The bill’s co-sponsors wrote a memo detailing the importance of the legislation, saying: In the landmark 2020 decision Bostock v. [read post]