Search for: "Bingham v. State" Results 81 - 100 of 390
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2017, 3:12 am by ASAD KHAN
In R v Asfaw [2008] UKHL 31, recalling the Refugee Convention’s broad humanitarian aims Lord Bingham explained that minority persons fleeing persecution “may have to resort to deceptions of various kinds (possession and use of false papers, forgery, misrepresentation, etc) in order to make good their escape. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 2:37 pm by familoo
This, the judge, stated should help concentrate minds on the relevant issues in cross-examination.) [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:30 am by Blog Editorial
Eadie QC: yes. 15.20 Eadie QC submits that Parliament set up a legislative scheme under the 1972 Act by way that actions by the UK Government and those of other member states flow back to affect member states. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am by Blog Editorial
  Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 6:50 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure – Jury instruction — Flight A jury in the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County convicted Sharnieli Nathaniel Bingham (“Bingham”) of second-degree assault. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 8:36 am by Dan Tench and Lucy Hayes, Olswang LLP
This is relevant to the judgment in Patel v Mirza (which had not been released at the date of our interview) relating to illegality: “The whole issue of how the Courts approach illegality as a defence to claims in contract and tort has been, to a degree, shaped by the Law Commission’s work on that area of law. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 9:05 am
The most frequently-quoted example of the limitation upon the Freedom of Speech is the quote from Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes in his 1919 written opinion in Schenck v. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 9:23 am
 Neither does the status of the owner (living v. not living). [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 4:50 am by Graham Smith
(Lord Bingham, A-G’s Ref (No 5 of 2002), 2004) "this impenetrable statute … one of the most complex and unsatisfactory statutes currently in force. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 4:50 am by Graham Smith
(Lord Bingham, A-G’s Ref (No 5 of 2002), 2004) "this impenetrable statute … one of the most complex and unsatisfactory statutes currently in force. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 4:50 am by Graham Smith
(Lord Bingham, A-G’s Ref (No 5 of 2002), 2004) "this impenetrable statute … one of the most complex and unsatisfactory statutes currently in force. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 7:42 am by Family Law Attorneys
The order specifically stated that the trial court did not rely on Dr. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
Pastor McConnell gave evidence as to his background and stated he became a Christian at the age of 8 and had been a full time preacher for 60 years. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 2:47 am by INFORRM
Secondly, the Court stated [66] that while the prosecution and defence arguments may be of assistance to the judge, there are interests – presumably the interest in open justice – that they cannot always adequately represent: ‘… there are some cases, of which the present… may be an example, where the judge would be greatly assisted by an independent lawyer assigned to provide assistance in the same way as in the present case both the [trial] judge and this… [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 10:00 am by Dan Ernst
Second, the framers of the Civil Rights Act sought to enforce the “privileges and immunities of citizens in the several states” protected under Article IV and described in the antebellum case Corfield v. [read post]