Search for: "Bird v Bird" Results 41 - 60 of 1,927
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2023, 7:32 am by Florian Mueller
Tilman Mueller-Stoy ("Müller-Stoy" in German), and defendants by Bird & Bird's Oliver Juengst ("Jüngst" in German). [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 12:09 pm by Joseph Koncelik
ACOE (2001)- Overruled ACOE jurisdiction of isolated wetlands based upon the migratory bird rule. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 12:09 pm by Joseph Koncelik
ACOE (2001)- Overruled ACOE jurisdiction of isolated wetlands based upon the migratory bird rule. [read post]
26 Aug 2023, 9:16 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
Milan and preservation of evidence The reasoning behind two ex parte orders to preserve evidence, issued by the Milan local division on 13 and 14 June 2023 (Oerlikon vs Himson, one and two), reflects a strong influence of the Italian colour local associated with descrizione, according to a Bird & Bird article. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 3:51 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
With respect to the Judiciary Law § 487 cause of action, the plaintiff failed to allege with specificity any material misstatements of fact made by the attorney defendants in the divorce action with the intent to deceive that court (see Bill Birds, Inc. v Stein Law Firm, P.C., 35 NY3d 173, 178 [2020]; see also Looff v Lawton, 97 NY 478, 482 [1884]). [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 5:03 am by Florian Mueller
The former brought an EU antitrust complaint against Nokia in late 2018 (which went nowhere), and the latter was not just one more intervenor on the automaker's behalf in the Nokia v. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 8:00 am
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) filed suit (EEOC v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
On the other hand, the Colorado restriction might not survive the application of United States v United Foods, Inc 533 US 405 (2001), where obligations upon fresh mushroom handlers pay assessments used primarily to fund advertisements promoting mushroom sales did not survive Central Hudson scrutiny as mediated through Glickman v Wileman Brothers & Elliott, Inc 521 US 457 (1997). [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 9:43 am
Take, for example, a hypothetical statute that says that it's illegal "to shoot a flying bird" within 500 feet of a state-owned drone. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 10:33 am by NARF
Supreme Court Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/2022-2023update.html One Petition for certiorari was filed on 7/3/23: Bird Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 6:05 am by Whitney Gravelle
” The spill killed fish, birds, turtles, and other animals, and devastated thousands of acres of rivers and forest. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 11:41 pm by Aaron Moss
A Matter of Perspective As another example, consider Steinberg v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 8:00 am
(Women were reportedly given positions with the company’s “small wares section,” where the pay was lower.)Since such conduct allegedly violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the EEOC filed suit, (EEOC v. [read post]