Search for: "Bishop v. People" Results 1 - 20 of 377
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2013, 7:51 am
The Episcopal Church, et al.; and No. 11-0332, Masterson v. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 9:00 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
In fact, the Pope is gathering the bishops in Rome in February 2019 for a sex abuse summit and so one can imagine why the United States bishops are being reined in.At the same time, one must assume, regardless of their public statements, that American bishops are frustrated. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:37 am by The Book Review Editor
The army also agreed to enter peace negotiations with the guerrillas, but both sides were far more interested in propping up their competing claims to represent the Guatemalan people than in making concessions. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 9:42 am
The result of this confusion is that LGBT's see themselves as "victims", and people like V. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 5:31 am
(For contemporary illustrations of this point, see the interpretation recently promulgated by Bishop Mark Lawrence, or the statement of Bishop Shaw on gay marriage in his diocese, or the court's decision in the Dixon v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 7:56 am by Hillary Byrnes
Hillary Byrnes is Assistant General Counsel for the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 1:20 pm by Rick Garnett
As Justice Douglas’s colleague, Justice William Brennan, insisted in Corporation of the Presiding Bishop v.... [read post]
1 Jan 2022, 8:28 am by David Bernstein
The late Bishop Desmond Tutu was a heroic anti-apartheid activist. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 11:12 am
(Reuters/Andreea Campeanu) From Bishop Macram Max Gassis v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 3:12 pm
To see the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department decisions (including index) released on June 25, 2008, click on the links below: Index to Slip Opinions Slip Opinions 06-24-2008 In Matter of Winford Kent Bishop People v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 7:50 am by boston
Today I’d like to report on an interesting sequel to that controversy.In a nutshell, the story breaks down like this: In 2000, Congress passed a law designed to crack down on those who engage in the sex trafficking of people; the law also contained provisions providing services to victims of this crime.The federal government searched for private contractors to help people who had been forced into this modern version of slavery. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 9:51 am by Staff Writer
  In 1994, RICO charges were successfully brought up against pro-life activists in NOW v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
The provisions of the Stipulated Final Order (full text) in People of the State of New York v. [read post]