Search for: "Bishop v. USA"
Results 21 - 40
of 124
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2020, 1:28 pm
(See Part I here, Part II here, Part III here, Part IV here, and Part V here.)The reason for its inability is that both the Constitution (Art. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 1:28 pm
(See Part I here, Part II here, Part III here, Part IV here, and Part V here.)The reason for its inability is that both the Constitution (Art. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 2:00 pm
At the same gathering at which it ratified the election of same-sex partnered (and now divorced) V. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 4:48 pm
decision by the Supreme Court of Texas in Episcopal Diocese of Fort Worth v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 2:25 pm
This case came to trial against the background of the South Carolina Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in All Saints Waccamaw Parish v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 11:13 am
Not content to have been the author of the wholly fictitious legal reasoning behind Roe v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 9:02 am
Of particular interest to Episcopalians is the current case in Massachusetts of Gill v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 2:28 pm
Thus just as they flouted Resolution 1.10 from the 1998 Lambeth Conference in 2003, when they approved the consecration of Bishop V. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 4:14 pm
For example, if A has sued B in state court for trademark infringement, and the case is about to be decided, a federal court should stay proceedings in the case of B v. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 7:04 am
In this case, the ministry of this one bishop will not be recognised by most of the Anglican world, and many provinces are likely to consider themselves to be out of Communion with the Episcopal Church (USA). [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 6:39 pm
Many other Bishops may not be aware of it just now, but they are going to face plenty of storms in their own dioceses after they return.This is not like General Convention 2003, when people had to read the news about the confirmation of V. [read post]
21 Jul 2012, 7:49 pm
Episcopal Church (USA) - the Spoiled Child of the Anglican CommunionHouse of Bishops Votes for Liturgical AnarchyDiocese of South Carolina Fed up with General ConventionYes, Paul Really Said ThatBishop Lawrence Addresses His Diocese Following General ConventionOn God's Truth and Man's HypocrisyBishop Sauls and the Ones Society Marginalizes - What about the Sinful Tax Collectors? [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 8:19 am
This meant aBudget allocated to Church legal expenses, 2004-2006 (under +Griswold): $765,000.00The Presiding Bishop of the Episcopal Church (USA), the Most Rev. [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 4:26 pm
(See this earlier post for the text of the original Constitution adopted in 1789, and see in particular Article V thereof.)Article I of the original Constitution established a "General Convention" -- a representative body composed of delegates ("deputies") elected and sent by the member dioceses, and (in a separate chamber, or "House") the bishops who headed up each member Diocese. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 1:31 pm
Robert v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 8:22 pm
" Cothran v. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 12:59 am
Circuit in the case of Rasul v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 10:51 am
[This series on the history of the revisions made to the Constitution of the Episcopal Church (USA) over the years 1889-1901 is in four parts. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 8:39 pm
(Schofield v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 5:33 am
In Beam v. [read post]
