Search for: "Bishop v. USA"
Results 41 - 60
of 124
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2012, 9:41 am
All of the case law thus far about the "hierarchical" character of the Episcopal Church (USA) developed out of disputes between dioceses and their parishes, or between bishops and their clergy. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 10:30 am
The first, The Episcopal Diocese of Fort Worth, et al. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 6:18 am
Your Curmudgeon is currently in Quincy, Illinois, working with co-counsel to prepare for the upcoming trial, which starts next week, in the case of The Diocese of Quincy, et al. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 7:16 pm
By reading Justice Blackmun's infamous dictum in Jones v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 11:33 am
But if a new diocese is formed out of an unorganized area, Article V itself spells out the procedure that is followed: "The proceedings shall originate in a Convocation of the Clergy and Laity of the unorganized area called by the Bishop for that purpose . . . [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 6:50 am
However, it has been 35 years since Jones v. [read post]
8 Apr 2018, 2:09 pm
The Second District Court of Appeals in Fort Worth has labored long and hard over the appeal taken by the Episcopal Church (USA) and its local diocese and parishes from the July 24, 2015 summary judgment order granted against them by Judge Chupp of the 141st District Court of Tarrant County. [read post]
8 Apr 2018, 8:26 pm
The Second District Court of Appeals in Fort Worth has labored long and hard over the appeal taken by the Episcopal Church (USA) and its local diocese and parishes from the July 24, 2015 summary judgment order granted against them by Judge Chupp of the 141st District Court of Tarrant County. [read post]
8 Jun 2013, 2:22 pm
The actual merger will not take place until General Convention meets, probably two years from now, to approve it pursuant to Article V of the Constitution. [read post]
14 Apr 2013, 6:32 am
The long-anticipated trial in the case of Diocese of Quincy, et al. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 11:41 am
That is why churches have ecclesiastical courts, and that is why the Episcopal Church (USA) brought its disciplinary charges against Bishop Lawrence. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:13 pm
He decided to leave the gathering on its second day, and explained his reasons in an announcement that castigated Canterbury's manipulation of the discussion process.It turns out that many of the other Primates attending were new to the game, and had little understanding of the divisive steps taken by ECUSA in 2003 with the consecration of Bishop V. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 11:05 am
But the Episcopal Church (USA) does -- all because of a repeated misreading of gratuitous dictum laid down by that careful scholar of the Constitution, Justice Harry Blackmun (the outcome-based author of Roe v. [read post]
21 Sep 2019, 9:30 am
This blog has almost (but not quite) ceased its coverage of things that are wrong with the Episcopal Church (USA), or ECUSA, as I choose to dub it. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 4:04 pm
This blog has almost (but not quite) ceased its coverage of things that are wrong with the Episcopal Church (USA), or ECUSA, as I choose to dub it. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 11:07 pm
[Note: This post is Part V of a series on amending the BCP and adopting trial or experimental liturgies for use in the Church, as we head into General Convention LXXVII later this week. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 9:23 am
For instance, the Church adopted its Dennis Canon in response to the United States Supreme Court's endorsement of neutral principles in the case of Jones v. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
That was and will be the broadest statute to revive SOLs in the United States, because the Supreme Court considered the law and held that criminal SOLs may not be revived, because that would violate the Ex Post Facto Clause in Stogner v. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 12:20 pm
Supreme Court's decision in Watson v. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 10:36 pm
The previous posts are the Introduction, Part I,Part II, Part III, Part IV and Part V.] [read post]
