Search for: "Black v. Clark"
Results 1 - 20
of 341
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Clark with the NAACP Legal Defense Fund lawyers, outside the U.S. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm
(I expect to assign the first article when I teach Johnson v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 7:03 am
Hannah V. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 5:01 am
From yesterday's decision by Judge Jessica Clarke (S.D.N.Y.) in Doe v. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Then the solidly and increasingly conservative George Sutherland replaced the progressive John Clark, an event that proved to be “a significant turning point” (39) and “steered the Court sharply to the right” (45). [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
Kelo v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 1:11 am
On 1 November, J Johnson handed down judgement of preliminary issues in the case of Clarke v Guardian [2023] EWHC 2734 (KB). [read post]
28 Oct 2023, 3:24 pm
Troops, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 6:30 am
Similarly, in Karnail Singh and others v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 9:00 pm
Clarke School of Law This year, the program is taking a team-based approach, with each team of three students taking on one of five projects aimed at the elimination of systemic racism and the creation of greater equity and accessibility in the U.S. legal system. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 11:45 pm
Even though Brown v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 10:48 pm
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 7:55 am
In Katz v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 9:38 am
Clark, 19 F. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
” He alleged that the prosecutor had used his peremptory challenges to keep more Blacks from serving on his jury.In Batson v Kentucky, the Court held that “While a defendant is not entitled to have a jury completely or partially composed of people of his own race, the state is not permitted to use its peremptory challenges to automatically exclude potential members of the jury because of their race. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm
On the same day, Fancourt J heard two applications in Duke of Sussex v NGN. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 3:28 pm
SEC v. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am
"[16] But Claiborne Hardware had no occasion to decide whether a person's not dealing with someone based on that someone's race was itself protected by the First Amendment, because it was clear that Mississippi law did not prohibit such private choices not to deal.[17] Under Mississippi law, whites could generally refuse to deal with blacks, and blacks could refuse to deal with whites. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 2:21 pm
Our second relist is a capital case, Clark v. [read post]
