Search for: "Black v. Davis" Results 101 - 120 of 586
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2015, 11:33 am by Steve Vladeck
In a ruling perhaps more noteworthy for an unusually testy exchange between two of the Justices in the majority, a five-to-four Supreme Court on Thursday sided with California in Davis v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 8:21 pm by Kevin Maillard
Jacquelyn Bridgeman (Wyoming) Part Four: Considering the Limits of Loving Black Pluralism in Post-Loving America Taunya Lovell Banks (Maryland) Multiracialism and Reparations: Accounting for Political Blackness Angelique Davis (Seattle) Crossing Borders: Loving v. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 10:13 am
" Termination of the Parent-Child Relationship of C.B., Jr.; Tyna Sims and Carl Black, Sr. v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 5:43 am by Susan Brenner
[T]he girls said they were waiting for `a black guy named J.B. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 4:09 am by tracey
Supreme Court Quila & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 45 (12 October 2011) AXA General Insurance Ltd & Ors v Lord Advocate & Ors (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 46 (12 October 2011) Ambrose v Harris, Procurator Fiscal, Oban (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 43 (6 October 2011) Her Majesty’s Advocate v P (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 44 (6 October 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Jones v Environcom Ltd… [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
  It is curated by Mary Ziegler, UC Davis School of Law (Harvard Gazette).Randall Kennedy, HLS, interviewed on Walker v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 8:30 am by Karen Tani
Martha Davis's excellent Brutal Need (1993) discusses him in some depth in a chapter on the road to Goldberg v. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 9:38 pm by Buce
 Cute if unkind, but it's worth reflecting on when we consider Mandela v., oh well, almost anybody else in Africa. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 7:00 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 39756 (WD KY, March 26, 2014), a Kentucky federal district court dismissed an inmate's complaint that he was denied religious services by being placed in segregation.In Davis v. [read post]