Search for: "Black v. Parole Board" Results 1 - 20 of 79
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2008, 1:39 am
R (Black) v Secretary of State for Justice [2008] EWCA Civ 359; [2008] WLR (D) 114 “S 35(1) of the Criminal Justice Act 1991, giving the Secretary of State power to override a Parole Board recommendation for the release on parole of a prisoner serving a sentence of more than 15 years, was not compatible with art 5(4) of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 2:13 am
R (Black) v Secretary of State for Justice [2009] UKHL 1; [2009] WLR (D) 19 “S 35(1) of the Criminal Justice Act 1991, in allowing the Secretary of State for Justice rather than the Parole Board to determine whether certain long-term prisoners should be released on licence at the half-way stage of their sentence, did not [...] [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 2:34 am
Regina (Black) v Secretary of State for Justice House of Lords “The provision requiring lawfulness of detention to be determined by a court was not infringed when the Secretary of State for Justice rather than the Parole Board determined whether certain long-term prisoners should be released on licence. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 5:23 am by SHG
Piagentini in her petition against the Parole Board. [read post]
The board wrote in s press release that, “[i]n Georgia, the Parole Board has the sole constitutional authority to grant clemency in a death penalty case. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 1:15 am by Anita Davies
The use of the s 255 power is not reviewed by the Parole Board. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 4:21 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
On the one hand, the reasoning in the case of R (Giles) v Parole Board [2003] UKHL 42 is in line with the Strasbourg jurisprudence. [read post]
Under the release provisions contained in CJA 2003, s 246A, he will not be eligible to apply to the parole board for early release until he has served two-thirds of his custodial term. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 1:44 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Sara & Hossein Asset Holdings Ltd (a company incorporated in the British Virgin Islands) v Blacks Outdoor Retail Ltd, heard 8th November 2022 R (on the application of Pearce and another) v Parole Board of England and Wales, heard 9th November 2022 [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 8:45 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Newman, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 816 (18 April 2008) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Mills v Birchall & Anor [2008] EWCA Civ 385 (18 April 2008) Oxford Legal Group Ltd v Sibbasbridge Services Plc & Anor [2008] EWCA Civ 387 (18 April 2008) Morgan v UPS Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 375 (17 April 2008) Strachey v Ramage [2008] EWCA Civ 384 (18 April 2008) Bonham & Anor v Fishwick & Anor [2008]… [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 5:26 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Kuzel v Roche Products Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 380 (17 April 2008) Manchester City Council v Moran & Anor [2008] EWCA Civ 378 (17 April 2008) TRM Copy Centres (UK) Ltd & Ors v Lanwall Services Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 382 (17 April 2008) Duffield & Anor v Gandy [2008] EWCA Civ 379 (17 April 2008) Dunn v Parole Board [2008] EWCA Civ 374 (16 April 2008) A v Essex County Council… [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 3:33 pm by John Elwood
PCAOB (involving the constitutionality of the Public Companies Accounting Oversight Board, created by Sarbanes-Oxley to guard against accounting monkey business); Black v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 10:10 pm by Old Fox
That attack sent one of the men to the hospital and landed Wahlberg in prison.In this Dec. 15, 2014 photo, Mary Belmonte reviews newspaper clippings she had collected about Mark  …Wahlberg, in a pardon application filed in November and pending before the state parole board, acknowledges he was a teenage delinquent mixed up in drugs, alcohol and the wrong crowd. [read post]
16 May 2022, 11:49 am by Brian Turetsky
Standard Contract Terms and the Parol Evidence Rule § 9. [read post]
6 May 2022, 2:25 pm by ACLU
As for individual cases, here are a few: ● Board of Pardons v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 8:25 am
But not without a chance, in the future, for a court or parole board to review his growth and development and consider another chance at parole. [read post]