Search for: "Black v. STATE, DEPT. OF MOTOR VEHICLES"
Results 1 - 8
of 8
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2010, 11:59 am
Center, 63 A.D.3d 1113 [2d Dept. 2009]. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 4:00 am
Mabus, No. 08-1238ADEASee issue description at Public CitizenSCOTUS docket hereUnited States Court of Appeals, 2nd CircuitHalpert v. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 7:24 am
Co., 14 AD3d 777 [ 3d Dept. 2005][ "resident-relative exclusion" in automobile policy did not violate legislative intent and public policy underlying the liability insurance coverage for motor vehicles mandated by Vehicle and Traffic Law § 311 (4)(a)]; compare, Lane v. [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 5:43 am
In Patouhas v Patouhas, 2019 WL 2202430 (2d Dept.,2019) plaintiff commenced an action for a divorce on March 1, 2016, by service of a summons with notice upon the defendant. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 5:03 pm
" (Black's Law Dict. (5th ed. 1979) p. 291, col. 2.) [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 12:22 am
Chase Manhattan Automotive Finance Corp. (2d Dept. 2008), previously discussed by us, here - $5,000,000 reduced from $7,400,000 for a 23 year old who sustained a below-the-knee amputation in a motor vehicle accident, underwent 11 surgeries and was unable to use a prosthesis Villaseca v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 5:45 am
Div., 1st Dept. 2010). [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
