Search for: "Blacks in Technology International v. Blacks in Technology LLC et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 45
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
Those of you who work in the compliance function are leaders inside your organization and through proactive internal engagement you will be better prepared to discharge your duties. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 6:11 am
” Other briefs that make this argument: Seattle School District No. 1; Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX), Congressman Mike Johnson (R-LA), et al. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:03 am
” Id. at 914; see also ResMan, LLC v. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 7:16 am
The State Secrets Law serves Chinese internal interests to be sure, and it does so with Chinese characteristics suitable to its political-economic model. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 2:36 pm
For instance, in SEC v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:57 pm
In the following guest post, Haynes and Boone, LLP Partners Dan Gold, Kit Addleman, Thad Behrens, Emily Westridge Black, Carrie Huff, Tim Newman, David Siegal, and Odean Volker take a look at the important securities litigation developments during 2017. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 12:09 pm
” SD3, LLC v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general… [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 3:49 pm
Winnipeg Regional Health Authority et al., 2015 MBCA 44 Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner [2014] IEHC 310 American Civil Liberties Union v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 5:08 am
After last year’s guidelines on black and white marks, reported by the IPKat here, it is now the turn of trade marks sharing elements with little or no distinctiveness.* Pom Wonderful the tenacious -- in pursuit of trade mark rightsNeil's first post of this year is about Pom Wonderful LLC v Hubbard et al, a decision rendered a few days ago by the 9th U.S. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 7:04 am
Marie-Andrée discusses the recent decision of the Southern District Court of Florida in Stacey Mattocks v Black Entertainment Television LLC. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 5:42 pm
Leslie, et al. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 7:44 am
The Court relisted for a second time in Nitro-Lift Technologies, LLC v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am
James III, et al. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am
In particular, because of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 12:01 am
Acer, et al. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 11:13 pm
USA Products Group Inc., et. al. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 2:54 am
BigMachines, Inc., et. al. [read post]
