Search for: "Blaine v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 78
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2023, 4:38 am by SHG
It is extremely difficult to square the state bar’s version with what the prosecutor said, as recounted in Miller v Pate. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 2:46 pm by Eugene Volokh
As a result, it is my opinion the United States Supreme Court has barred the state from enforcing its Blaine Amendment. [read post]
1 Oct 2022, 11:40 am by Larry
The Supreme Court stated in United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 6:51 am by Howard M. Wasserman
The federal government’s arguments Assistant to the Solicitor General Michael Huston argued for the United States in support of Egbert. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 7:24 am by Howard M. Wasserman
The federal government’s arguments The United States appears as amicus and has been given argument time. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 9:38 am by Mindy Harris
Supreme Court’s June 29, 2020 decision in Seila Law LLC v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 2:18 pm by Ilya Somin
Montana Department of Revenue, which is likely to lead to the invalidation of Blaine Amendments barring state assistance to religious schools in 37 states; he also voted with the majority in Bostock v. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 5:30 am by Guest Blogger
One must look to the whole history of the United States to see whether and when fidelity to constitutional principles has lapsed between the founding and today. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 12:04 pm by James Hirsen
Alito pointed out the following: “Montana’s provision was modeled on the failed Blaine Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 3:42 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the court will decide next term “what constitutes criminal “computer misuse” under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 10:32 am by Larry
United States, newly minted U.S. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 4:01 am by Edith Roberts
United States, involving how to determine what constitutes a “serious drug offense” under the Armed Career Criminal Act, for this blog. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which stems from the “Bridgegate” controversy in New Jersey and involves the extent to which federal fraud statutes cover the politically motivated acts of public officials. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 10:16 pm by Bona Law PC
Brief of the United States (Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission), in support of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and Rasier, LLC, v. [read post]