Search for: "Blake v. Grant"
Results 21 - 40
of 422
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2007, 1:20 am
Blake. [read post]
25 Mar 2007, 8:02 am
Blake (not approved for publication)Upon consideration, the motion for partial summary judgment of the defendant ("Schartiger") is GRANTED except as to any claim for compensation due under the terms of the Agent Agreement, and the motion to compel of the plaintiff ("Weaver") is DENIED.This case arose out of the termination of an Agency Agreement (the "Agreement") between Schartiger, owner of an insurance company, and Weaver, a former agent of the… [read post]
8 May 2009, 2:51 pm
Blake v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 12:04 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 11:54 pm
Blake. [read post]
20 May 2007, 4:14 pm
As detailed in this post, I am part of a team seeking cert in Faulks v. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 9:23 am
In sum, the judge found that Erachem had not met its "exacting burden" of showing the arbitrator had "dispensed his own brand of justice" in granting the award, and affirmed. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 2:49 am
Blake. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 12:04 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 7:23 am
In Blakely v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 12:52 pm
v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 11:50 pm
An Apprendi/Booker/Blakely opinion today by the Supreme Court. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 2:37 pm
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and Blakely v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 2:29 am
Blake, 392 S.C. 494, 709 S.E.2d 79 (Ct.App. 2011), cert. dismissed as improvidently granted, Op. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 9:25 am
Judge Koeltl granted a petition for a writ of habeas corpus to inmate William Washington in Washington v. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 4:25 pm
As we suggested in our preview of Tuesday’s oral argument in Ross v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 3:42 am
This was the case in a recent decision, Heike Blake v. [read post]
2 Aug 2004, 7:26 am
in Penaranda, as well as the petition for rehearing in Blakely v. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 9:12 am
Blake (not approved for publication)On motion for summary judgment made by the plaintiff ("Western"), the judge GRANTED summary judgment in favor of Western and DECLARED the amounts due under certain insurance policies.This case arose from a claim made by a tenant (Greene") for lead paint exposure over four years' occupancy in a residence insured by the landlord's insurance company ("Western World") in a series of four one-year policy periods. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 2:14 am
The Rule 29 motion was granted. [read post]
