Search for: "Blake v. Secretary of Health & Human Services"
Results 1 - 7
of 7
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2020, 1:00 am
On Friday 23 October, the Supreme Court will hand down the judgment of R (on the application of Pathan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 11:23 am
The FDCA confers “complete discretion” on the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) to enforce the FDCA’s provisions. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 2:24 am
The Panopticon blog has a post about the decision in W, X, Y and Z v Secretary of State for Health, Secretary of State for the Home Department and British Medical Association [2015] EWCA Civ 1034 concerning the sharing of medical information. [read post]
1 May 2023, 9:01 pm
Over the past several years, the use of non-disclosure agreements (“NDAs”) has received significant public scrutiny following their controversial use in a number of high profile harassment claims.[1] NDAs were back in the headlines earlier this year following the leak to the Telegraph of around 100,000 Whatsapp messages belonging to the former UK Health Secretary Matt Hancock.[2] The messages, which revealed Mr Hancock’s communications with other members of the… [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 2:57 am
On 1 November 2022, there was a trial of preliminary issues in the case of Blake v Fox. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 1:11 am
On 2 November 2023, Nicklin J heard a pre-trial review and application notices in the case of Blake and others v Fox. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:55 am
A similar view was reached by the Divisional Court in R (P) v Secretary of State for Justice [2016] 1 WLR 2009 and by Blake J in R (G) v Chief Constable of Surrey Police [2016] 4 WLR 94. [read post]
