Search for: "Blake v. State"
Results 181 - 200
of 974
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2009, 4:00 am
Earlier this year, the Virginia Supreme Court decided Martin Brothers Contractors, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 11:35 am
Note that Boyle was one of four Blakely-related cases argued together. [read post]
16 Jun 2005, 11:00 am
Ct. 2531 (2004), United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 3:38 am
Co. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 9:05 am
State v. [read post]
25 Sep 2012, 4:43 pm
As the First Circuit describes it in United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 11:13 am
United States and Gall v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 10:33 am
Supreme Court docket to watch, from the highly publicized Fourth Amendment GPS tracking case in United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 7:11 pm
Here is the abstract: While striking down Washington's mandatory sentencing guidelines scheme in Blakely v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 11:56 pm
The post Case Comment: R (AA) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] UKSC 49 appeared first on UKSC blog. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 3:37 am
From the perspective of a police officer, as the law requires the shooting be considered under Graham v. [read post]
17 Aug 2004, 12:05 pm
"[1] In Blakely v. [read post]
21 Apr 2007, 3:51 am
With respect to the breach of contract claim , Holland based his claim on an express contractual provision stating that "the parties hereto shall deal with one another fairly and in good faith. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 1:53 pm
S. 466 (2000); Blakely v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 1:25 pm
New Jersey (2000) 530 U.S. 466 (Apprendi) and Blakely v. [read post]
15 Oct 2006, 7:39 am
US v. [read post]
5 May 2012, 12:17 pm
In the Apprendi line of cases, Scalia consistently sought to contrast Breyer’s vision with what he characterized as the “common-law ideal of limited state power” (to quote his opinion for the majority in Blakely v. [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 6:10 pm
But if an Ontario case, Leibel v. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 2:59 pm
License: Blake v. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 2:59 pm
License: Blake v. [read post]
