Search for: "Blake v. State" Results 501 - 520 of 980
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2012, 9:04 pm by CAPTAIN
  And second, remember that there is a large segment of the membership of the DCBA that has never seen the inside of a State courtroom. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 3:34 am by Russ Bensing
  That’s exactly what happened in State v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 9:24 am by Jon Sands
 The state petitioner raised Blakely issues before the  California Supreme Court. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 10:05 pm
Para 159, to the extent it notes that restitution is “frequently based upon the theory of unjust enrichment”, is undoubtedly correct, but it may not be accurate to suggest that there “can be no restitution without unjust enrichment”, for the law does recognise restitution for wrongs (Attorney General v Blake). [read post]
27 May 2012, 12:49 pm by PaulKostro
First Nat’l State Bank of N.J., 87 N.J. 163, 175-76 (1981) (quoting Gellert v. [read post]
13 May 2012, 9:36 am
(gastoniafamilylaw.com)MAG: Ryan Reynolds Annulling Scarlett Johansson Marriage To Wed Blake Lively (gossipcop.com)Kim Kardashian & Kris Humphries: Are Annulment Rumors Hogwash? [read post]
5 May 2012, 1:00 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
In the Apprendi line of cases, Scalia consistently sought to contrast Breyer’s vision with what he characterized as the “common-law ideal of limited state power” (to quote his opinion for the majority in Blakely v. [read post]
5 May 2012, 12:17 pm by Michael O'Hear
In the Apprendi line of cases, Scalia consistently sought to contrast Breyer’s vision with what he characterized as the “common-law ideal of limited state power” (to quote his opinion for the majority in Blakely v. [read post]