Search for: "Blake v. State"
Results 541 - 560
of 980
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm
(United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 9:15 am
At the Volokh Conspiracy Orin Kerr weighs in on some of the Chief Justice’s questions during last month’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 8:39 am
In People v Nappo (94 NY2d 564 [2000]), we held that the State was not the “owner” of uncollected taxes within the meaning of the statutory definition of the term because “taxes due were not the property of the State prior to their remittance” (id. at 566). [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:09 pm
In Public Agency Compensation Trust v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 1:59 am
Their estimate is based on a 2007 CDC FoodNet survey that found ~3% of people surveyed in 10 states reported drinking raw milk in the last 7 days (25). [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 3:35 am
The first is a Blakely v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 10:30 am
The style of the case is John Earl Bullard v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 3:25 am
The dissent argued based on BLAKE and DUDA, that once a violation of 240(1) is shown a plaintiff's conduct can't be held as a matter of law to be the sole proximate cause of his accident, stating; "Since we believe that the record contains factual issues regarding the Labor Law § 240 (1) cause of action, we respectfully dissent. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 10:01 am
In Judulang v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 12:29 pm
Judulang v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 12:00 am
Blake Const. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 10:33 am
Supreme Court docket to watch, from the highly publicized Fourth Amendment GPS tracking case in United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 11:36 am
Ed. 2d 929 (2007) and Ashcroft v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 7:17 am
US v Blake (a/k/Garnett), N.D. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 3:43 am
Last week, in State v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 10:44 am
Blake Farenthold (R-TX), claims that the Constitution only permits the federal government to provide states with “block grants. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 4:39 am
Co. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 3:49 am
Take a look at State v. [read post]
