Search for: "Blake v. United States" Results 221 - 240 of 462
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2007, 7:10 pm
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), his counsel should have raised a Sixth Amendment challenge to the sentencing enhancements, even though Nichols was sentenced in 2002, more than two years before the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 9:12 am by Rick St. Hilaire
The United States District Court for the District of Maryland has said no to the Ancient Coin Collectors Guild’s (ACCG) request to challenge issues previously argued in the case of Ancient Coin Collectors Guild v. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 10:18 am by Paul Clement
Take, for example, Justice Stevens’ solo dissent in United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 4:52 am
It particularly refers to the practice of pursuing a case in England and Wales, in preference to other jurisdictions, such as the United States, which provide more extensive defences for those accused of making derogatory statements. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 11:25 am by Eugene Volokh
On the other hand, I’ve seen other appellate opinions do the same thing (see, e.g., United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 2:45 pm
Ice, which deals with Blakely's applicability to consecutive sentencing determinations, and United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 2:47 pm by John Elwood
United States, 11-5721:  Blake v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 9:53 am by Adam Feldman
United States, Merit Management Group v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 7:11 am
New Jersey (2000) and Blakely v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 10:00 am
If this is giving you a feeling of queasy familiarity after Justice O'Connor's prescient Blakely dissent, you are not alone. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 12:45 pm by aallwash
” Recently, AALL promoted Malamud’s petition for an amendment to the Copyright Act that would make clear that edicts of government have no copyright in the United States. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 9:05 am by Amy Howe
”  Molly also rounded up early coverage and commentary on yesterday’s four-four tie in United States v. [read post]