Search for: "Blakeney v. Blakeney"
Results 1 - 20
of 27
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2020, 12:54 pm
Criminal procedure — Motion to suppress evidence — Search warrant After a jury trial in the Circuit Court for Charles County, Gregory Sylvester Blakeney, appellant, was convicted of possession of more than 10 grams of marijuana. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 5:56 am
Blakeney v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 4:29 pm
Blakeney endorsed the Third Circuit’s articulation of this concept in United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 6:00 am
The case is State v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 6:00 am
The case is State v. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 1:57 pm
Here is a summary of Blakeney v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 4:00 am
A Comment on the Judgments in Jivraj v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 8:04 am
See U.S. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 8:00 am
Doe v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 8:26 am
On Art & Artifice, Simone Blakeney discusses public funding of the arts. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 1:00 pm
Blakeney, ___ N.C. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 1:00 pm
Blakeney, ___ N.C. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 4:11 am
60/10 Jackson International Trading Co v OHIM When companies like Jackson Trading Co. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 5:01 am
When the provisions are inserted into the tax law administered by the IRS, rather than into the law dealing with economic assistance handled by other agencies, it adds the the Tax Court’s workload, though it creates jobs for tax lawyers.A recent case, Blakeney v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 4:05 pm
On Art & Artifice Simone Blakeney reports on the ongoing tale of alleged design thefts by US company Cody Foster. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 7:08 am
Michael Blakeney explores the potential overlap between copyright and patent law when fine art techniques are patented as methods of manufacture in the next chapter. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 3:20 pm
Simone Blakeney comments on the Tyson tattoo on Art & Artifice here. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 7:40 am
Censorship in Australia is the topic of Simone Blakeney's hot-off-the-press post on Art & Artifice. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 7:21 am
Naoise explains: It's in response to the recent case [EMI v UPC, here] in which the Irish courts took the view that they were not fully compliant with the Copyright/Infosoc Directive and the Enforcement Directive. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 3:10 pm
You can read Joe Cohen's piece on Gimex v The Chillbag Company here. [read post]
