Search for: "Blanco v Polanco" Results 1 - 1 of 1
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2019, 4:16 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Moreover, we agree with the Supreme Court’s determination that triable issues of fact existed with respect to whether the plaintiff sustained damages proximately caused by the D’Errico defendants’ alleged malpractice (see Portilla v Law Offs. of Arcia & Flanagan, 125 AD3d 956, 957; Blanco v Polanco, 116 AD3d 892, 895). [read post]