Search for: "Blanco v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 110
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2010, 10:31 am
The suit, Mesa Water, L.P. and G&J Ranch, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 8:25 am
The District Court agreed and dismissed Count One, and the Eleventh Circuit affirmed in United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 7:48 am
People v Blanco, 2009 NY Slip Op 8631, 2009 N.Y. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
United States, 986 F. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
United States, 986 F. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
United States, 986 F. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:09 am
United States, 986 F. [read post]
21 May 2009, 10:45 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 11:35 pm
Bates v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 8:41 am
Note: the most recent California case where a products liability action against a manufacturer of a medical device was preempted by federal law can be found here: Blanco v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 2:49 pm
Medtronic; Blanco v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 6:40 pm
So even though the medical device did not pass all of the state's safety requirements, in Blanco v. [read post]
17 May 2008, 5:30 pm
Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority, No. 06-0873 (Tex. [read post]
27 Apr 2008, 3:13 am
V&V became aware of Wisconsin Cheese's QUESO CARIBE no later than 1993; in March of that year, V&V sent a cease and desist letter to Wisconsin Cheese, describing V&V's mark as QUESO BLANCO SUPREMO DEL CARIBE (registered in Illinois). [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 8:46 am
Phillips, No. 07-0522 Grant of habeas petition ordering conviction be vacated based on state's Brady violation is vacated in part as to barring of retrial of count of depraved indifference murder as petitioner had not exhausted his state remedies with respect to that relief. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 9:19 am
Se licenció con calificación magna cum laude en la Universidad de Colby, donde aprendió que no todos los problemas pueden reducirse a blanco o negro. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 6:53 am
The case is Jessen v. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 12:02 pm
There are lots more cases recognizing broad preemption in product liability cases involving pre-market approved (PMA) medical devices than refusing to, but strange things happen in tort preemption cases, so we don't view anything - especially in state court - as a sure thing.Blog reader Alan Lazarus over at Drinker Biddle has just (and we do mean just) sent us a favorable PMA preemption opinion, Blanco v. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 8:30 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 11:20 am
United States v. [read post]
