Search for: "Blatt v. Blatt"
Results 1 - 20
of 151
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2024, 2:53 pm
Kavanaugh spoke at some length about his opinion in Labrador v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 9:08 am
Medical Marijuana, represented by Supreme Court veteran Lisa Blatt, petitions for review, arguing that the courts of appeals “are divided on whether economic damages arising from persual injuries … support civil RICO liability. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 6:28 am
ShareThe oral argument Tuesday in Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 9:46 am
The general principle here (see Weinberger v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 7:05 pm
I attended oral arguments in the case Snyder v. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 1:45 pm
1.SCOTUS will hear Fischer v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 7:37 am
Under the Supreme Court’s 2019 decision in Nieves v. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 4:52 pm
The US Supreme Court heard oral arguments Wednesday on the case Gonzalez v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 3:41 pm
” Though Blatt insisted that her interpretation rested directly on the Supreme Court’s opinion in Barnett Bank v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
Introduction: Rebecca Tushnet What might we derive from things the Court has said about trademark of late? [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
A partial dissenting opinion argued that the majority applied too strict a test regarding the penny stock bar (SEC v. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 6:17 am
” “ Betz commenced an action against the respondent, and multiple successor attorneys who served the executor and/or the estate, in the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entitled Debra Betz, Administrator of the Estate of Carmelo Carbone (a/k/a Mel Carbone ) v Arnold Blatt, et al. [read post]
8 May 2023, 3:50 am
“A cause of action alleging a violation of Judiciary Law § 487 must be pleaded with specificity” (Betz v Blatt, 160 AD3d 696, 698; see Long Is. [read post]
5 May 2023, 6:23 am
Schindler v Isller & Schrage, P.C., 262 AD2d 226 [1st Dept 1999], lv dismissed 94 NY2d 791 [1999] [plaintiff granted judgment on Judiciary Law § 487 claim as defendant law firm knowingly withheld crucial information from court in underlying action]; cf Betz v Blatt, 160 AD3d 696 [2d Dept 2018] [defendant attorney was properly denied summary dismissal of Judiciary Law § 487 claim based on allegations that he filed blatantly deficient accounting with court,… [read post]
1 May 2023, 10:54 am
Indeed, Lisa Blatt mentioned her brief by name during oral argument in Warhol v. [read post]
2 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
Google and Twitter v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 1:27 pm
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, which held that the toy was protected under the reasoning of Rogers v. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 11:44 am
I was pleased to attend oral argument today in Jack Daniel's Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
Google and Twitter v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 5:58 am
[I only count two votes to ratify Big Tech's sweeping immunity claims] The Supreme Court's oral argument in Gonzalez v. [read post]
