Search for: "Block v. Commissioners"
Results 141 - 160
of 747
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2016, 5:27 am
In one, the much-debated Delfi v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 8:27 am
"Specification 3 alleged that on or about and between April 23, 1998, and December 17, 1998, Wolfe testified falsely while under oath during an official court proceeding, in violation of Penal Law §210.15.The Appellate Division explained that “It is well settled that the principles of due process applicable to criminal trials apply to government administrative proceedings, citing Matter of Murray v Murphy, 24 NY2d 150” and that the requirements of due process of law… [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 8:56 am
However, tentatively our overall sense is that the EDPB opinion is not attempting to block the adequacy decision. [read post]
15 May 2016, 4:00 am
https://t.co/GzwN0Nt45P -> Link to Maltz v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 4:30 am
Facebook copyright hoax goes viral yet again http://t.co/FEpOQJWoGT -> Decision made by U of Ottawa not to renew licence with Access Copyright http://t.co/S00TXIxHyq -> Dotcom: 'Aussies just as dumb as Kiwis' – Technology http://t.co/mMBNy6XU3y -> FBI outlines money trail in Dotcom case http://t.co/HipdnM7uIV -> SEC Cybersecurity Updates http://t.co/HH4Y6DI8Ty -> EU digital chief has plenty to discuss in D.C. http://t.co/Y6tCYW5yYw -> Opinion: Fighting cybercrime… [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 6:25 am
Circuit explained in its 1980 FTC v. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 10:07 am
Tomorrow, July 16, 2020, the European Court of Justice (CJEU) is expected to rule in the case of Data Protection Commissioner Ireland v Facebook Ireland Limited, Maximillian Schrems, colloquially known as “Schrems 2.0”. [read post]
16 May 2016, 3:18 pm
Alphonsus Medical Center v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 7:36 am
Project Blue Ltd v Commissioners for HMRC was heard on 28 Feb-1 Mar 2018. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 4:30 am
Test for obviousness set out in Newco Tank Corp. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:13 am
There is another requirement that may raise the ire of some foreign services and force them to consider blocking the Canadian market. [read post]
3 May 2015, 4:30 am
http://t.co/AoBszeibPT -> LinkedIn’s “Reference Search” Service Doesn’t Violate Fair Credit Reporting Act–Sweet v. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 5:15 am
In an important judgment in the case of Stunt v Associated Newspapers ([2017] EWHC 695 (QB)) that will be reassuring to news media organisations, the High Court has determined that section 32(4) of the Data Protection Act 1998 is not incompatible with EU law. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 5:30 am
http://t.co/hQDovsMelV -> The Sound of the Internet is Not So Sweet to the Ears of David Lowery http://t.co/ihFIPOFpxv -> Singapore Government to consult on role of website blocking in fighting online copyright infringement http://t.co/49noMfIMbQ -> "Focus on IP Law: A Conversation with Eric Schwartz." [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 4:30 am
Good luck http://t.co/JxJM5S7Zdc -> blogged: Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2015-03-30 http://t.co/qQIhyJ7T4N -> Richard Atwell's spyware allegations vindicated by privacy commissioner http://t.co/b7culvW8KI -> Bell Canada faces $350 million patent infringement hearing next week http://t.co/2LoBESzH1h -> Irish ISP is forced to set up three-strikes http://t.co/6TdUYLhq13 -> Vidal-Hall v Google, Good case summary here http://t.co/yzDaFL3qt3 -> QVC… [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 4:01 pm
Site blocking orders 2014 saw the most significant UK site blocking case since Newzbin2, Cartier v BSkyB. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 8:55 am
Commissioner. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 12:35 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California’s order granting a preliminary injunction in East Bay Sanctuary et al. v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 5:00 am
Some of the suggestions were: .The role of the CPO in the US v the EU .The differences in approach in the public v the private sector .Data Security .The human flesh search phenomenon in China .The inclusion of Generation Y and their point of view on Privacy issues. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 12:29 pm
The Court denied the application for injunctive relief in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]