Search for: "Blue v. Division of Corporations"
Results 1 - 20
of 125
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2010, 3:06 am
High Court (Chancery Division) American Express Services Europe Ltd v HM Revenue & Customs [2010] EWHC 120 (Ch) (29 January 2010) Byers & Ors (Liquidators of Madoff Securities International Ltd) v Yacht Bull Corporation & Anor [2010] EWHC 133 (Ch) (01 February 2010) High Court (Family Division) S (A Child), Re [2010] EWHC B1 (Fam) (04 January 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) Hines v Secretary of State for the Home Department… [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 8:15 am
KeySpan Corporation (CCH Trade Regulation Reporter ¶50,975).In addition, the Division filed civil antitrust lawsuits against Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan and (together with seven states) against American Express, MasterCard, and Visa.In the first suit, the Division challenged “most-favored nations” (MFN) clauses in Blue Cross’s agreements with hospitals that allegedly limit the discounts the hospitals can offer to… [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 12:58 am
As stated by the Appellate Division, First Department in Yudell v Gilbert, borrowing from the Delaware Supreme Court’s Tooley formulation, the determination depends on “(1) who suffered the alleged harm (the corporation or the stockholders); and (2) who would receive the benefit of any recovery or other remedy (the corporation or the stockholders individually). [read post]
12 May 2011, 1:41 am
Supreme CourtAdams, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18 (11 May 2011)Revenue & Customs v Tower MCashback LLP 1 & Anor [2011] UKSC 19 (11 May 2011)Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)Zejmowicz & Anor, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 1173 (11 May 2011) Nicholas & Anor v R. [2011] EWCA Crim 1175 (11 May 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division)Mahan Air & Anor v Blue Sky One Ltd & Ors… [read post]
13 May 2015, 7:58 am
Oliva et al. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 6:00 am
Last week, the Court of Appeal (Fourth Appellate District, Division Three) picked up its blue pencil and crossed this provision out of the FAL. [read post]
26 Nov 2023, 7:06 am
By now, readers are well aware that ESG has become a politically divisive issue. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 9:05 pm
Pitman quashed one subpoena seeking to compel testimony from corporate Blue Bell officials that the judge found violating attorney-client privilege. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 3:48 am
Schecter in Van Horne v Ben-Dov, preliminarily enjoining a freeze-out merger of a close corporation for lack of a valid business purpose. [read post]
12 May 2018, 9:11 am
This symposium explores these and other issues.Keynote Lecture: James V Feinerman, Associate Dean for Transnational Programs, Co-Director, Georgetown Law Asia, and James M. [read post]
18 Apr 2020, 4:50 am
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Texas, Inc. and Health Care Service Corporation. [read post]
24 Jul 2021, 5:36 am
Blue Cross And Blue Shield Of Texas, A Division Of Health Care Service Corporation. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 5:33 am
This was an issue in a 2020 opinion from the Southern District of Texas, Galveston Division, styled, Louise Odom Hayes v. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 12:54 pm
For example, in VantagePoint Venture Partners 1996 v. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 6:06 am
In Williams v. [read post]
3 Aug 2008, 12:14 pm
Although this is probably no more than commonplace advertising in a competitive market, a Division Bench of the Delhi High Court (Pepsi Co v. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 1:39 am
Subscription Required ESSEX COUNTY Administrative Law Court Addresses Propriety of Agency's Enactment Procedures, Capacity of Municipalities to Challenge New York Blue Line Council Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 3:28 am
Plaintiff’s sixth cause of action for common-law corporate dissolution, should have been dismissed under the doctrine of unclean hands, as plaintiff’s embezzlement demonstrated that he could not seek equitable relief (see Blue Wolf Capital Fund II, L.P. v American Stevedoring, Inc., 105 AD3d 178, 184 [1st Dept 2013]). [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 8:47 am
¶9 / The Court refused to “blue pencil” the covenant because ” North Carolina’s strict blue pencil doctrine allows the court to “avoid scrapping an entire covenant” by “enforc[ing] the divisible parts of [the] covenant that are reasonable. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 1:48 pm
Advocates of these measures claim to be non-partisan, but they have demonstrated little support even in many light-blue and purple states she won, much less in states where she was buried. [read post]
