Search for: "Board of Directors v. Superior Court"
Results 161 - 180
of 543
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2008, 6:03 am
Because the business judgment rule applies to decisions made by the board of directors, as opposed to corporate officers or other representatives, all significant decisions – to the extent possible – should be made, or ratified, by the board. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 2:26 pm
In reaching its decision, the Supreme Court expressly adopted the test articulated by the Delaware Supreme Court in Tooley v. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 2:26 pm
In reaching its decision, the Supreme Court expressly adopted the test articulated by the Delaware Supreme Court in Tooley v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 10:52 am
" The trial court found that Royal was a member of the local foundation’s board of directors and served as its paid bookkeeper/accountant. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 12:26 pm
Francis v Acting Director, DC Office of Planning, 2023 WL 4846625 (D. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 6:00 am
” [2] In 1996, the Delaware Superior Court ruled similarly in Stuchen v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 5:00 am
Fox v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
Under the interpretation provided by the Delaware courts, management has almost unlimited discretion when it comes to expenditures (something confirmed by the Delaware Supreme Court in CA v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:28 am
In Edmond v. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 7:20 pm
Burlington Admins’ Assoc. v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 12:29 pm
” This clear-and-convincing-evidence standard, the court held in today’s Davis v. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
An earlier Court of Appeal case (Jozipovic v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 12:32 pm
The Court noted that: [i]n an odd twist of fate, they support this view by citing Saltz v. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 12:46 pm
A recent Ontario Superior Court decision highlights precisely such a scenario and brings several important lessons for condominium directors. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 8:10 am
The court concluded by rejecting the following arguments advanced by the defendant: (1) that the district court’s failure to indicate that it used the reasonable doubt standard of proof deprived the superior court of jurisdiction on appeal from the district court’s order; (2) that it was error for the superior court to allow the district court judge to testify in the de novo hearing on appeal from the district… [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 5:37 am
Plaintiff sought an administrative determination by the county’s planning department (the “Department”), appealed to the zoning board of appeals (the “ZBA”), and then petitioned the Superior Court of Forsyth County (the “Superior Court”) that affirmed the ZBA’s ruling against Petitioner. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 8:46 am
" Accordingly, the court reversed the division’s civil sanction against the appellant and remanded the matter for a determination of attorney fees (Ahmasuk v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 9:30 pm
” Edmond v., 520 U.S. 651, 661–63 (1997). [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 7:04 am
Lidow, filed August 13 last year in Los Angeles Superior Court — revolves around “certain of the Company’s directors and former officers…” Derivative lawsuits, of course, take the stance that the plaintiff is suing a company’s managers or directors on behalf of the company itself, in effect. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 3:12 pm
Superior Court Kevin D. [read post]
