Search for: "Board of Education v. A, C & S, INC" Results 41 - 60 of 424
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm by admin
Irving Selecoff arrived in Glasgow, Scotland, from New York City, on board the SS. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 8:00 am by CFM Admin
District Court for the District of New Hampshire granted the SEC’s motion for summary judgment against LBRY, Inc., holding that LBRY offered a crypto asset in violation of the registration provisions of federal securities laws. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 4:00 am by CFM Admin
District Court for the District of New Hampshire granted the SEC’s motion for summary judgment against LBRY, Inc., holding that LBRY offered a crypto asset in violation of the registration provisions of federal securities laws. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 7:49 am by Eugene Volokh
The United States Supreme Court recently elucidated the structure of the required analysis in New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n, Inc v Bruen (2022). [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 4:22 pm by Howard Knopf
Ariel Katz following York’s defeat at the trial level in 2017: Access Copyright v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
Abattoir Agri-Bio inc. c. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 2:56 pm by INFORRM
Quebecor Media Inc. et al, 2022 ONSC 3749. [read post]
29 May 2022, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The Panopticon Blog had an article on the recently discontinued representative claim SMO v TikTok Inc and Others [2022] EWHC 489 (QB). [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
  Remarkably, there are state and federal court judges who continue to misunderstand and misinterpret regulatory risk assessments, notwithstanding efforts to educate the judiciary. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The court explained that the Department of Education's action was not arbitrary and capricious, noting that "[J]udicial deference to an agency's interpretation of its own regulations is a basic tenet of administrative law," citing Andryeyeva v New York Health Care, Inc., 33 NY3d 152, and that it had previously ruled that "DOE employees must 'strictly' comply with the procedures set forth in Chancellor's… [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The court explained that the Department of Education's action was not arbitrary and capricious, noting that "[J]udicial deference to an agency's interpretation of its own regulations is a basic tenet of administrative law," citing Andryeyeva v New York Health Care, Inc., 33 NY3d 152, and that it had previously ruled that "DOE employees must 'strictly' comply with the procedures set forth in Chancellor's… [read post]