Search for: "Board of Education v. Eisenberg" Results 1 - 7 of 7
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Plaintiffs in this action contend State and City policies deny Black and Latinx students their state constitutional right to a "sound basic education"
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Coyle, Arthur Eisenberg, Rae Shih, Molly K. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
Plaintiffs in this action contend State and City policies deny Black and Latinx students their state constitutional right to a "sound basic education"
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Coyle, Arthur Eisenberg, Rae Shih, Molly K. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
Chapter 7 (Law Beyond Law ― Social Norms, Contract Communities, and Disclosure Regimes): From "Elements of Law" to "Introduction to the Law and Legal System of the United States"--Building an Introductory Course to the Legal Curriculum for the 21st Century
20 Sep 2014, 1:06 pm
·      Melvin Eisenberg, Corporate Law and Social Norms,[1] 99 Colum. [read post]
Law at the End of the Day - http://lcbackerblog.blogspot.com/
Today's Headlines and Commentary
16 Feb 2018, 2:10 pm by Jordan Brunner
William Ford posted the Fourth Circuit’s ruling in IRAP v. [read post]
Lawfare - http://www.lawfareblog.com/
Balancing the Best Interests of Children with Religious, Contract, and Individual Rights
20 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
That balance is remarkably reflected in the August 16, 2017 decision in Weisberger v. [read post]
Divorce: New York - http://www.divorceny.com/
Balancing the Best Interests of Children with Religious, Contract, and Individual Rights
20 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
That balance is remarkably reflected in the August 16, 2017 decision in Weisberger v. [read post]
Divorce: New York - http://www.divorceny.com/
December 14, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
— Nicholas Eisenberger & David Gottesman, Harvard Business Publishing, December 7, 2009 There are plenty of reasons to be disappointed with the Copenhagen climate talks that start today: the meeting will not result in a binding agreement, the timeframe for such an agreement is potentially years away, and of course, neither the US nor China has committed to binding reductions. [read post]
Environmental Law & Climate Change Law Blog - http://taberlaw.wordpress.com