Search for: "Board of Supervisors v. Dolan"
Results 1 - 5
of 5
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2023, 2:00 am
The trial court held that the heightened scrutiny in Nollan/Dolan did not apply to the TIM fees, and that the County complied with the MFA requirements in Government Code section 66001, subdivision (a), when the County Board of Supervisors adopted the TIM fees. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 7:42 am
Critically, the land and fee exactions challenged successfully in the Nollan, Dolan and Koontz decisions all involved exactions imposed by land use regulators on an individual and discretionary basis–not as part of a general, broadly-applicable legislative mandate like the TIM fee program adopted and implemented by the El Dorado County Board of Supervisors. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:12 am
This fee formed part of a broader “General Plan” established by the County’s Board of Supervisors to address escalating demands for public services spurred by new developments. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 11:04 pm
Seven years later, in Dolan v City of Tigard, the Court returned to its newly-minted “unconstitutional conditions” doctrine. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:10 pm
U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, August 28, 2008 US v. [read post]
