Search for: "Board of Supervisors v. Superior Court (1994)"
Results 1 - 18
of 18
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2015, 9:21 am
Superior Court (1997) 55 Cal.App. 4th 93, 102; Friends of the Old Trees v. [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
Kindermann In a lengthy and unanimous reversal of the trial court on ESA and CEQA issues in Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
Superior Court, S207173. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
Superior Court, S207173. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 9:37 am
Gray appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court affirming the Department of Public Safety's denial of Gray's application for a professional investigator license based on posts and comments that Gray made on social media, using an account bearing the name of his out-of-state private investigation business, concerning a Maine State Police lieutenant. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 10:38 am
Monk v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 1:01 pm
“Sovereign immunity protects the state and its various divisions, such as agencies and boards, from suit and liability, whereas governmental immunity provides similar protection to the political subdivisions of the state, such as counties, cities, and school districts. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
The Board enforced the regulation against a physician who did not possess the required specialty board certification. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
Pakdel v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 6:15 am
FACTUAL and PROCEDURAL HISTORY Miracle Star, owned and operated by Jeffrey and Staretta Moffatt, provides drug and alcohol treatment and rehabilitation services at a location in Lancaster, California. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
The Court of Appeal, citing Locklin v. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 3:00 am
The Court of Appeal, citing Locklin v. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 3:00 am
The Court of Appeal, citing Locklin v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 10:24 am
As CEQA practitioners will discover upon reading this case, Royalty, Friends, and the decision in Board of Supervisors v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
The Court of Appeal, citing Locklin v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm
., at or in the direction of another, whether or not the actor believes it to be loaded; or (5) Commits a simple assault as defined in subsection a. (1), (2) or (3) of this section upon: (a) Any law enforcement officer acting in the performance of his duties while in uniform or exhibiting evidence of his authority or because of his status as a law enforcement officer; or (b) Any paid or volunteer fireman acting in the performance of his duties while in uniform or otherwise clearly identifiable as… [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9] However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10] He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the People’… [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9] However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10] He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the People’… [read post]
