Search for: "Bob Bauer, Benjamin Wittes" Results 121 - 140 of 165
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2017, 5:15 pm by Alex Potcovaru
Bob Bauer responded to Blackman and others, refuting the emerging argument that a president who dismisses senior law enforcement officials cannot be impeached for obstruction, regardless of motive. [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 3:59 am by Garrett Hinck
Bob Bauer discussed how the Flynn plea deal relates to other lies from Donald Trump associates and the special counsel investigation’s focus on collusion. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 9:50 am by Garrett Hinck
Bob Bauer discussed how the lies from Trump associates will affect the special counsel investigation’s focus on collusion. [read post]
2 Dec 2017, 4:53 am by Garrett Hinck
  Wittes also posted a special edition of the Lawfare Podcast, featuring a discussion of of the Flynn case with Lawfare editors and contributors:  Bob Bauer argued that the Russia investigation does not imply a “criminalized politics” as Alan Dershowitz has worried. [read post]
11 Nov 2017, 6:03 am by Garrett Hinck
Vanessa Sauter posted a second episode of the Lawfare Podcast, featuring a discussion between Benjamin Wittes and Susan Landau on her new book “Listening In”: Bob Bauer argued that President Trump’s attack of the justice system is symptomatic of his demagogic political instincts. [read post]
4 Nov 2017, 4:13 am by Garrett Hinck
Wittes also posted a special edition of the Lawfare Podcast, featuring a discussion with Bob Bauer and Paul Rosenzweig about Monday’s events. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 10:20 am by Garrett Hinck
  Benjamin Wittes shared a special edition of the Lawfare Podcast, featuring a discussion with Bob Bauer and Paul Rosenzweig about Monday’s special counsel investigation developments. [read post]
14 Oct 2017, 5:05 am by Garrett Hinck
Vanessa Sauter posted the Lawfare Podcast, featuring audio from a Lawfare event at which Susan Hennessey spoke with former White House counsels Bob Bauer and A.B. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 11:32 am by Vanessa Sauter
Benjamin Wittes posted this week’s Rational Security podcast. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 11:20 am by Garrett Hinck
They will join Susan Hennessey and Benjamin Wittes in a discussion on the challenges of lawyering for and against the current administration. [read post]
23 Sep 2017, 5:32 am by Garrett Hinck
Benjamin Wittes flagged the reply brief filed on cert in Bahlul vs. [read post]
16 Sep 2017, 6:32 am by Garrett Hinck
Bob Bauer argued that the impeachment process should be viewed more as a safeguard on the modern presidency than as a constitutional crisis. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 10:38 am by Garrett Hinck
  ICYMI: Yesterday, on Lawfare Bob Bauer argued that impeachment may be more acceptable today than in the past because of the context of our rapidly evolving political system. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 1:37 pm by Matthew Kahn
Former White House Counsels Bob Bauer, who served in the Obama administration, and A.B. [read post]
2 Sep 2017, 5:33 am by Garrett Hinck
Jane Chong and Benjamin Wittes argued that the time has come for Congress to open a formal impeachment inquiry into President Trump. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 12:16 pm by Vanessa Sauter
Matthew Kahn posted the Lawfare Podcast, where Benjamin Wittes and Susan Hennessey answered listener questions. [read post]
26 Aug 2017, 4:10 am by Matthew Kahn
Bob Bauer described what President Trump’s proposed pardon of Joe Arpaio would signal about his presidency. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 10:56 am by Vanessa Sauter, Matthew Kahn
Bob Bauer argued that pardoning Joe Arpaio would mark a fateful step for the Trump presidency. [read post]
19 Aug 2017, 3:48 am by Matthew Kahn
Bob Bauer explained how the attack in Charlottesville shows the President’s true attitudes toward the Constitution’s mandate of equal treatment for all citizens. [read post]
12 Aug 2017, 3:27 am by Alex Potcovaru
Bob Bauer responded with some doubt to Rick Pildes’ August 3 argument that a judicially enforceable codification of regulations on the DOJ special counsel would be constitutional. [read post]