Search for: "Bobby v. Van Hook"
Results 21 - 40
of 42
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2009, 8:37 am
Van Hook discussed here and here. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 8:17 am
Porter’s wartime experience and the trauma that it produced, Greenhouse writes, the Justices revealed their sympathy for the defendant, in contrast to their ruling last month to uphold the execution of death-row inmate Robert Van Hook. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 6:13 am
Van Hook (6th Circuit) and Wong v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 12:33 pm
Supreme Court, November 09, 2009 Bobby v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 7:47 am
Supreme Court's recent opinion in Bobby v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 8:00 pm
Van Hook.) [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 6:39 pm
In Bobby v. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 8:10 am
At the BLT, Marcia Coyle describes Justice Alito’s separate opinion concurring in the Court’s summary disposition of Bobby v. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 7:01 am
That's the title of the post at BLT reporting on Justice Alito's concurring opinion this week in Bobby v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 8:13 am
News media and the blogosphere also cover the Court’s summary reversal in Bobby v. van Hook. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 5:40 am
Bobby v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 2:22 pm
You can find the opinion in Bobby v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 11:41 am
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE, ETHICS & PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY, HABEAS CORPUS, PER CURIAM Bobby v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 10:08 am
The Court summarily reversed the Sixth Circuit (Merritt, Martin, Moore) in the case of David Bobby (I guess that’s Ricky’s brother), Warden v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 8:58 am
[but there was a] summary disposition in the case Bobby v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 7:05 am
Van Hook (09-144), which was granted and reversed. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 7:02 am
 In the ten-page, unsigned decision in Bobby v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 7:46 pm
Van Hook (09-144) – originally Conference 9.29 United States Defense Department v. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 11:11 am
Van Hook (09-144) United States Defense Department v. [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 5:59 pm
Van Hook (09-144) United States Defense Department v. [read post]
