Search for: "Bodnar v. Bodnar"
Results 1 - 20
of 46
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2011, 3:11 am
BAUMIESTER, by BARBARA BODNAR, as Administratrix Ad Prosequendum and BARBARA BODNAR, Individually v. [read post]
7 May 2011, 3:14 am
BAUMIESTER, by BARBARA BODNAR, as Administratrix Ad Prosequendum and BARBARA BODNAR, Individually v. [read post]
7 May 2011, 3:09 am
BAUMIESTER, by BARBARA BODNAR, as Administratrix Ad Prosequendum and BARBARA BODNAR, Individually v. [read post]
24 Jun 2012, 2:51 pm
In his recent Opinion in the automobile accident case of Bodnar v. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 3:34 am
Katsoris v Bodnar & Milone, LLP 2020 NY Slip Op 05040 Decided on September 23, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department is a good example. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 2:37 pm
In today’s case (Bodnar v. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 7:50 pm
Bodnar & Milone, LLP, 2020 NY Slip Op 05040 (New York Appellate Division Second Department). [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 3:00 am
In Perez v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 3:06 am
The complaint also failed to adequately allege actual, ascertainable damages (see Denisco v Uysal, 195 AD3d 989, 991; Katsoris v Bodnar & Milone, LLP, 186 AD3d at 1506). [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 11:19 am
Matusevitch (Md. 1997); Bachcan v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:20 am
“The fact that the plaintiff subsequently was unhappy with the settlement [she] obtained . . . does not rise to the level of legal malpractice” (Katsoris v Bodnar & Milone, LLP, 186 AD3d at 1506 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Schiller v Bender, Burrows & Rosenthal, LLP, 116 AD3d 756, 758; Holschauer v Fisher, 5 AD3d 553, 554). [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 7:09 am
Andrew Bodnar Cobell v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 11:00 am
Williams v. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 10:18 am
In his recent Opinion in the case of Bodnar v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 4:53 pm
Canada (Attorney General) v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 3:00 am
Moreover, the plaintiff’s allegations that the failure of the defendants to make such an application constituted negligence were conclusory (see [*3]Katsoris v Bodnar & Milone, LLP, 186 AD3d 1504, 1506; Hashmi v Messiha, 65 AD3d 1193, 1194-1196). [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 3:43 am
” “ Here, the plaintiffs failed to plead that, but for the defendants’ negligence, they would have prevailed in the underlying action (see Katsoris v Bodnar & Milone, LLP, 186 AD3d at 1506; Keness v Feldman, Kramer & Monaco, P.C., 105 AD3d at 813). [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 10:50 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Steve Bodnar v. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
Corbett, [*2]P.C., 175 AD3d 473, 473-474 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Katsoris v Bodnar & Milone, LLP, 186 AD3d 1504, 1505; Betz v Blatt, 160 AD3d 696, 697). [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 5:44 am
The plaintiff’s claims that the defendant could have negotiated a more favorable settlement, that her former spouse would have accepted a settlement offer that was more favorable to her, or that she would have received a more favorable outcome at trial had she declined to enter into the settlement are conclusory and speculative (see Katsoris v Bodnar & Milone, LLP, 186 AD3d 1504, 1506; Janker v Silver, Forrester & Lesser, P.C., 135 AD3d 908, 910). [read post]
